The Program on Geopolitics, Technology, and Governance (GTG) examines how emerging technologies—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and smart devices—are redefining power, economies, and policies worldwide. Our research addresses the complex challenges these advances pose for international security, and how governments, businesses, and individuals adapt to shifting landscapes of risk and opportunity.
Artificial intelligence is reshaping economies, security, and governance worldwide, raising urgent questions about how to distribute its benefits equitably while managing risks. GTG examines how democracies can leverage AI innovation to advance shared prosperity and security, with particular attention to infrastructure requirements, Global South perspectives, and mechanisms for international cooperation.
Related projects:
AI for Peace
This research initiative investigates how the United States and its allies and partners can leverage their comparative advantages in AI innovation to equitably distribute the benefits of AI while incentivizing trustworthy deployment. The research focuses on three key areas:
Infrastructural requirements for deploying AI at scale for countries at all levels of economic development and multilateral, multi-stakeholder mechanisms for meeting those requirements.
Global South perspectives on promising use cases for AI and governance approaches for facilitating AI deployment while managing risks.
Prospects and options for international collaborations to address cross-border security, environmental, and other externalities.
The Future of Decision-Making Project (FODM) is a multi-year, interdisciplinary research initiative examining how emerging technologies—particularly artificial intelligence and advanced decision-support systems—are reshaping human decision-making in high-stakes domains such as national security, defense, and crisis management. Rather than focusing solely on technological capability, the project centers on the human dimension: how judgment, responsibility, and accountability evolve as machines increasingly inform, shape, or constrain human choices. The project brings together scholars and practitioners from academia, government, and industry to develop empirically grounded, policy-relevant insights into the future of human-machine decision systems.
GEOPOLITICS OF TECHNOLOGY
Emerging technologies are becoming central to great power competition and regional security dynamics. GTG examines how technological advantages translate into geopolitical leverage, how U.S. strategy can balance competition with innovation and alliance partnerships, and how technology is reshaping power dynamics across critical regions like East Asia.
GTG's annual conference and ongoing research initiative brings together leading regional experts, policymakers, and industry leaders to examine how technological developments are reshaping geopolitical dynamics across East Asia. The research focuses on critical technology supply chains—particularly semiconductors—regional responses to U.S.-China competition, and opportunities for multilateral cooperation on technology governance.
CHINA & DIGITAL COMPETITION
China's rapid digital development and distinct governance approaches have profound implications for global markets, security, and technology standards. GTG analyzes Chinese technology policy and corporate strategies through original-language sources, providing insights into how China's digital trajectory shapes international competition and governance debates.
The DigiChina project, led by Graham Webster, enhances understanding of China's digital policy developments through translating and analyzing Chinese-language sources. Since 2017, DigiChina has published translations of primary sources, contextual explanation, and analysis on China’s technology policy landscape, covering topics including the Cybersecurity Law regime, data governance, artificial intelligence, and China’s official push for greater technological independence.
CYBERSECURITY & INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
Effective governance of technology challenges requires sustained dialogue and cooperation across borders. GTG facilitates Track II exchanges with international partners, building relationships and shared understanding that can lay groundwork for broader policy cooperation on cybersecurity and technology governance issues.
Recent Publications
Publications
Filter:
Filter resultsClose
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Antigua & Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Belize
Brunei
Canada
Caribbean
China
Denmark
Eastern Europe
Northeast Asia
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Benin
Bolivia
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Burma
Central America
Central Europe
Costa Rica
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Estonia
Fiji
Japan
Mexico
Oceania
Portugal
Barbados
Belarus
Bhutan
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Cambodia
Egypt
El Salvador
Finland
France
Germany
Iberian Peninsula
Kiribati
Mongolia
North America
South Asia
Spain
United States
Burkina Faso
Chile
Croatia
Cuba
East Timor
Georgia
Greece
Guatemala
Hungary
India
Iran
Latvia
Marshall Islands
North Korea
Scandinavia and Baltic Rim
South America
Southeast Asia
Burundi
Colombia
Dominica
Honduras
Iceland
Indonesia
Iraq
Kazakhstan
Kosovo
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Maldives
Micronesia
South Korea
Western Europe
Cameroon
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Ireland
Israel
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Macedonia
Nauru
Nepal
Nicaragua
Norway
Poland
Taiwan
Cape Verde
Grenada
Guyana
Italy
Jordan
Malaysia
Moldova
Montenegro
New Zealand
Pakistan
Panama
Slovakia
Sweden
Central African Republic
Haiti
Kuwait
Luxembourg
Palau
Paraguay
Philippines
Romania
Russia
Slovenia
Sri Lanka
Chad
Jamaica
Lebanon
Malta
Papua New Guinea
Peru
Serbia
Singapore
Switzerland
Tajikistan
Comoros
Libya
Monaco
Samoa
St. Kitts & Nevis
Suriname
Thailand
Turkmenistan
D.R. Congo
Morocco
Netherlands
Solomon Islands
St. Lucia
Ukraine
Uruguay
Vietnam
Congo
Oman
San Marino
St. Vincent & the Grenadines
Tonga
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Côte d'Ivoire
Qatar
Trinidad & Tobago
Tuvalu
United Kingdom
Djibouti
Saudi Arabia
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Equatorial Guinea
Syria
Eritrea
Tunisia
Ethiopia
Turkey
Gabon
United Arab Emirates
Gambia
Yemen
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Säo Tomé & Príncipe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
The Americas
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Middle East and North Africa
Russia and Eurasia
Sub-Saharan Africa
2024 MIP Class
Admissions
Aging
Agricultural trade
AHPP Working Paper Series
Alumni
APARC In-House Series
Arms Control
Biofuels
Capstone
CDDRL 20th Anniversary
CDDRL Research in-brief
CDDRL Seminar Write-ups
Children's health
Class of 2024
Class of 2025
Conference Blog
Corruption
Courtesy Faculty
Democracy promotion
Early Childhood Development
Entrepreneurship Inside Government
European Union
GKC
GKC Leadership
Globalization
Graduation
Hacking for Defense (H4D)
Health
Health and the Environment
Hypertension
In the Classroom
Inclusion and Exclusion
Inequality
Infrastructure
International Law
Internship Blog
Israel Fellows
Masters in International Policy
Meet the Class
Migration and Citizenship (Society)
National Security Innovation Scholars
Obesity
Palm Oil
Profile
Race
Rule of Law
SAI
Shorenstein APARC Policy and Working Papers
Smoking
Social Media Lab
Staff
Takedown
Teaching Team
Technology
Technology, Innovation, and Great Power Competition
Vision Care
Agriculture
Agriculture policy
Arms Smuggling
Borders
Cap and Trade
Comparative effectiveness research
Culture
Democracy
Disaster response
Health care institutions
HIV/AIDS
Kyoto Protocol
Population health
State-building
Biosecurity
Business
Demographics
Diabetes
Elections
Health policy
Media
World Bank
Aquaculture
Bioterrorism
Cleantech
Coal
Discrimination
Disease
Health Care Reform
Human Rights
Investment
Military
Protectionism
World Trade Organization
Diplomacy
Economic Affairs
Electricity
Global Health
Homeland Security
Information Technology
Intelligence
NATO
Civil Wars
Climate
Education
Energy and Climate Policy
Ethnicity
Foreign Aid
Health Care
Institutions and Organizations
Negotiation
Climate change
Conflict
Energy Infrastructure
Entrepreneurship
Foreign Policy
Gender
Health Outcomes
Peacekeeping
Policy Analysis
Energy Services
Food Markets
History
Migration and Citizenship
Crime
Cybersecurity
Deforestation
Fossil Fuels
Islam
Nutrition
Trade
Fisheries
Food Security
Public Health
Drug trafficking
Hunger
Natural gas
Publication Series
Shorenstein APARC Studies with Stanford University Press
Innovation
Nuclear Energy
Religion
Nuclear policy
Poverty
Natural Resources
Renewable Resources
Science and Technology
Kidnapping
Oil
Water
Sustainable development
Missiles
Nuclear Risk
Nuclear Safety
Terrorism
Torture convention
Violence
Governance
International Relations
Health and Medicine
International Development
Security
Energy
Environment
Society
Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center
Center for Health Policy / Department of Health Policy
Center for International Security and Cooperation
Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law
Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies
The Europe Center
Center on Food Security and the Environment
Stanford Center at Peking University
Bechtel Conference Center At Encina Hall
Internal Center (Content Staging)
Cyber Center
Center on China’s Economy and Institutions
Program on Energy and Sustainable Development
Korea Program
Southeast Asia Program
Stanford Program on Regions of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
China Program
Stanford Program on International and Cross-Cultural Education
Global Affiliates Program
Asia Health Policy Program
Program on Human Rights
Rural Education Action Program
Arab Reform and Development Program
Draper Hills Summer Fellows Program
Program on Poverty and Governance
Japan Program
Stanford International Crime and Violence Lab
Austrian and Central European Program
European Governance
Europe and the Global Economy
Migration
France and the Francophone World
Iberian Studies Program
Industrial Affiliates Program
Program on American Democracy in Comparative Perspective
Taiwan Program
GDPI
Student Programs
Global Populisms
Ford Dorsey Master's Program in International Policy
American Journal of Political Science,
May 23, 2025
The rise of social media in the digital era poses unprecedented challenges to authoritarian regimes that aim to influence public attitudes and behaviors. To address these challenges, we argue that authoritarian regimes have adopted a decentralized approach to produce and disseminate propaganda on social media. In this model, tens of thousands of government workers and insiders are mobilized to produce and disseminate propaganda, and content flows in a multidirectional, rather than a top-down manner. We empirically demonstrate the existence of this new model in China by creating a novel data set of over five million videos from over 18,000 regime-affiliated accounts on Douyin, a popular social media platform in China. This paper supplements prevailing understandings of propaganda by showing theoretically and empirically how digital technologies are transforming not only the content of propaganda, but also how propaganda materials are produced and disseminated.
Achieving minimum dietary diversity (MDD), a crucial indicator of infant and young child diet quality, remains a challenge in rural China, especially for infants aged 6–11 months. This study examined the rate of MDD attainment in rural China, identified its determinants using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior (COM-B) model and Bayesian network analysis, and estimated the potential impact of improving each modifiable determinant. A multi-stage sampling design selected 1328 caregivers of infants aged 6–11 months across 77 rural townships in China. Data were collected through a cross-sectional survey via in-person household interviews. Bayesian network analysis identified key factors influencing MDD attainment and their interrelationships, while Bayesian inference estimated MDD attainment probabilities. Results showed that only 22.2 % of the sample infants attained MDD. Bayesian network analysis revealed that caregiver knowledge (a proxy of capability), self-efficacy and habits (proxies of motivation), and infant age directly influenced MDD attainment. Social support (a proxy of opportunity) indirectly promoted MDD attainment by boosting self-efficacy and habit. Notably, simultaneous improvements in knowledge, self-efficacy, and habit could increase MDD attainment by 17.6 %, underscoring the potential effectiveness of interventions focused on enhancing caregiver capability and motivation. The critically low MDD attainment rate among rural Chinese infants highlights the urgent need for targeted interventions. Strategies should prioritize enhancing caregiver feeding knowledge, self-efficacy, and habit formation to improve infant dietary diversity. Addressing these key factors could substantially boost MDD attainment in rural China.
The latest crisis was triggered by a terrorist attack at Pahalgam on April 22, which was especially provocative — and likely calculated to be so — by targeting specifically Hindu men for point-blank execution.
Journal of Medical Internet Research,
May 15, 2025
Background: The content of children’s screen exposure and interactive coviewing with caregivers are important determinants of early childhood development (ECD) that have been overlooked in past research in resource-limited rural regions. Given the prevalence of digital devices and diverse digital content today, determining screen use practices that minimize the negative impacts on children’s development is crucial for promoting healthy screen use among children.
Objective: This study aims to examine screen exposure among children aged <3 years in rural China and investigate its relationship with ECD outcomes, focusing on duration, content, coviewing, and interaction.
Methods: The sample includes all children aged between 6 and 26 months and their primary caregivers residing in the study area. A survey of screen exposure and household characteristics was conducted for 1052 eligible households. Caregivers reported the duration of screen exposure, defined as the average daily screen time over the past month; the content of exposure, defined by the time spent on educational and child-friendly content; and the caregiver’s presence and interaction with the child during exposure. ECD outcomes were evaluated using the third edition of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development assessment scale and the Brief Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment. Ordinary least squares regression, logistic regression, and chi-square tests were conducted.
Results: In total, 28.23% (297/1052) of the children in our sample were first exposed to screens before the age of 12 months. Children exposed to screens had an average daily screen time of 27.57 (SD 38.90) minutes. Children who were exposed to screens before the age of 12 months and those who had longer screen time between the ages of 12 and 18 months were more likely to be at risk of motor developmental delays. Children exposed to educational content for >15 minutes on a daily basis had fewer social-emotional or behavioral problems than those with no screen exposure and a lower risk of delay in motor skills development than those exposed to educational content for <15 minutes on a daily basis. Caregiver interaction during screen exposure was associated with a lower risk of cognitive and language delays and better socioemotional skills.
Conclusions: The type of content viewed and how caregivers engaged in children’s screen time were strongly associated with ECD outcomes. Guiding parents to select educational content for their children and engaging in interactive coviewing may better protect children from the negative effects of screen exposure. The findings complement conclusions regarding the impact of screen exposure on ECD in resource-limited rural areas.
Using reading performance data from a randomized controlled trial of 5224 fifth-grade students in East China, this paper provides a novel test of the hypothesis that evoking a gender stereotype creates gender gaps in education through self-fulfilling prophecies. We found that without intervention, boys performed worse than girls did in reading tests. Evoking a gender stereotype by indicating the expected outperformance of girls over boys in reading had a significantly negative effect on boys and an insignificant effect on girls. As a result, the net effect on the gender gap in reading performance was economically important but statistically insignificant. We also found evidence that increased anxiety was likely the underlying mechanism. Finally, a heterogeneous analysis showed that boys from environments with biased gender role beliefs were more susceptible to the intervention.
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER),
May 5, 2025
China’s total fertility rate declined very little following implementation of the One Child Policy (OCP) in 1979/1980, but then fell sharply, by more than one-third, during the early 1990s. In this paper, we propose that strengthening bureaucratic incentives under the “One Vote Veto” (OVV) policy, which strictly prohibited career promotion for adherence failure, was necessary for more “effective” implementation of the OCP—and for its delayed impact on fertility. We use provincial variation in OVV implementation to estimate event study regression inputs needed to build actual and counterfactual sequential multi-decrement fertility life tables, finding that the policy explains 46% of China’s total fertility rate decline during the 1990s, driving it below replacement level. Use of intrauterine devices (IUDs, the most prevalent form of modern contraception in China) that was “recommended” by party officials increased by 133% under the policy, a relative increase more than four times as large as the increase in “voluntary” use. Overall, our paper suggests that population policy made a larger contribution to low fertility in China than suggested by past research. More generally, our paper highlights the central role of aligning bureaucratic incentives with public policy objectives, even in a centrally-planned economy like China’s.
Researchers analyzed three decades of sanctions on foreign aid to assess their impact on health. They hope the work can help government officials better understand and address how foreign policy decisions affect the well-being of local populations.
Part of "Deliberative Approaches to Inclusive Governance: An Essay Series Part of the Democratic Legitimacy for AI Initiative," produced by the Centre for Media, Technology and Democracy.
This paper examines how power lawyers shape judicial and economic outcomes by studying the “revolving door” between judges and lawyers in China’s judicial system—namely, former judges who quit the bench to practice law. In otherwise identical lawsuits, revolving-door lawyers deliver 8−23% higher win rate for their clients. Their performance in home versus away courts suggests these gains stem from both “know how” and “know who.” We extend the theoretical framework of Dewatripont and Tirole (1999) to show that revolving-door lawyers create countervailing forces in society: they enhance judicial decision-making through evidence and reasoning, but also exploit strategic arguments and connections to bias outcomes in favor of their clients. We estimate a structural model of the judicial process to quantify these trade-offs and find that increasing the supply of power lawyers can have a non-monotonic effect on equilibrium judicial quality.
Federal IT is a worthy target for Musk and his team of efficiency hackers. It’s overpriced with various estimates pegging the government’s costs at two to four.