The Program on Geopolitics, Technology, and Governance (GTG) examines how emerging technologies—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and smart devices—are redefining power, economies, and policies worldwide. Our research addresses the complex challenges these advances pose for international security, and how governments, businesses, and individuals adapt to shifting landscapes of risk and opportunity.
Artificial intelligence is reshaping economies, security, and governance worldwide, raising urgent questions about how to distribute its benefits equitably while managing risks. GTG examines how democracies can leverage AI innovation to advance shared prosperity and security, with particular attention to infrastructure requirements, Global South perspectives, and mechanisms for international cooperation.
Related projects:
AI for Peace
This research initiative investigates how the United States and its allies and partners can leverage their comparative advantages in AI innovation to equitably distribute the benefits of AI while incentivizing trustworthy deployment. The research focuses on three key areas:
Infrastructural requirements for deploying AI at scale for countries at all levels of economic development and multilateral, multi-stakeholder mechanisms for meeting those requirements.
Global South perspectives on promising use cases for AI and governance approaches for facilitating AI deployment while managing risks.
Prospects and options for international collaborations to address cross-border security, environmental, and other externalities.
The Future of Decision-Making Project (FODM) is a multi-year, interdisciplinary research initiative examining how emerging technologies—particularly artificial intelligence and advanced decision-support systems—are reshaping human decision-making in high-stakes domains such as national security, defense, and crisis management. Rather than focusing solely on technological capability, the project centers on the human dimension: how judgment, responsibility, and accountability evolve as machines increasingly inform, shape, or constrain human choices. The project brings together scholars and practitioners from academia, government, and industry to develop empirically grounded, policy-relevant insights into the future of human-machine decision systems.
GEOPOLITICS OF TECHNOLOGY
Emerging technologies are becoming central to great power competition and regional security dynamics. GTG examines how technological advantages translate into geopolitical leverage, how U.S. strategy can balance competition with innovation and alliance partnerships, and how technology is reshaping power dynamics across critical regions like East Asia.
GTG's annual conference and ongoing research initiative brings together leading regional experts, policymakers, and industry leaders to examine how technological developments are reshaping geopolitical dynamics across East Asia. The research focuses on critical technology supply chains—particularly semiconductors—regional responses to U.S.-China competition, and opportunities for multilateral cooperation on technology governance.
CHINA & DIGITAL COMPETITION
China's rapid digital development and distinct governance approaches have profound implications for global markets, security, and technology standards. GTG analyzes Chinese technology policy and corporate strategies through original-language sources, providing insights into how China's digital trajectory shapes international competition and governance debates.
The DigiChina project, led by Graham Webster, enhances understanding of China's digital policy developments through translating and analyzing Chinese-language sources. Since 2017, DigiChina has published translations of primary sources, contextual explanation, and analysis on China’s technology policy landscape, covering topics including the Cybersecurity Law regime, data governance, artificial intelligence, and China’s official push for greater technological independence.
CYBERSECURITY & INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
Effective governance of technology challenges requires sustained dialogue and cooperation across borders. GTG facilitates Track II exchanges with international partners, building relationships and shared understanding that can lay groundwork for broader policy cooperation on cybersecurity and technology governance issues.
Recent Publications
Publications
Filter:
Filter resultsClose
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Antigua & Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Belize
Brunei
Canada
Caribbean
China
Denmark
Eastern Europe
Northeast Asia
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Benin
Bolivia
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Burma
Central America
Central Europe
Costa Rica
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Estonia
Fiji
Japan
Mexico
Oceania
Portugal
Barbados
Belarus
Bhutan
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Cambodia
Egypt
El Salvador
Finland
France
Germany
Iberian Peninsula
Kiribati
Mongolia
North America
South Asia
Spain
United States
Burkina Faso
Chile
Croatia
Cuba
East Timor
Georgia
Greece
Guatemala
Hungary
India
Iran
Latvia
Marshall Islands
North Korea
Scandinavia and Baltic Rim
South America
Southeast Asia
Burundi
Colombia
Dominica
Honduras
Iceland
Indonesia
Iraq
Kazakhstan
Kosovo
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Maldives
Micronesia
South Korea
Western Europe
Cameroon
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Ireland
Israel
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Macedonia
Nauru
Nepal
Nicaragua
Norway
Poland
Taiwan
Cape Verde
Grenada
Guyana
Italy
Jordan
Malaysia
Moldova
Montenegro
New Zealand
Pakistan
Panama
Slovakia
Sweden
Central African Republic
Haiti
Kuwait
Luxembourg
Palau
Paraguay
Philippines
Romania
Russia
Slovenia
Sri Lanka
Chad
Jamaica
Lebanon
Malta
Papua New Guinea
Peru
Serbia
Singapore
Switzerland
Tajikistan
Comoros
Libya
Monaco
Samoa
St. Kitts & Nevis
Suriname
Thailand
Turkmenistan
D.R. Congo
Morocco
Netherlands
Solomon Islands
St. Lucia
Ukraine
Uruguay
Vietnam
Congo
Oman
San Marino
St. Vincent & the Grenadines
Tonga
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Côte d'Ivoire
Qatar
Trinidad & Tobago
Tuvalu
United Kingdom
Djibouti
Saudi Arabia
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Equatorial Guinea
Syria
Eritrea
Tunisia
Ethiopia
Turkey
Gabon
United Arab Emirates
Gambia
Yemen
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
Säo Tomé & Príncipe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
The Americas
Asia-Pacific
Europe
Middle East and North Africa
Russia and Eurasia
Sub-Saharan Africa
2024 MIP Class
Admissions
Aging
Agricultural trade
AHPP Working Paper Series
Alumni
APARC In-House Series
Arms Control
Biofuels
Capstone
CDDRL 20th Anniversary
CDDRL Research in-brief
CDDRL Seminar Write-ups
Children's health
Class of 2024
Class of 2025
Conference Blog
Corruption
Courtesy Faculty
Democracy promotion
Early Childhood Development
Entrepreneurship Inside Government
European Union
GKC
GKC Leadership
Globalization
Graduation
Hacking for Defense (H4D)
Health
Health and the Environment
Hypertension
In the Classroom
Inclusion and Exclusion
Inequality
Infrastructure
International Law
Internship Blog
Israel Fellows
Masters in International Policy
Meet the Class
Migration and Citizenship (Society)
National Security Innovation Scholars
Obesity
Palm Oil
Profile
Race
Rule of Law
SAI
Shorenstein APARC Policy and Working Papers
Smoking
Social Media Lab
Staff
Takedown
Teaching Team
Technology
Technology, Innovation, and Great Power Competition
Vision Care
Agriculture
Agriculture policy
Arms Smuggling
Borders
Cap and Trade
Comparative effectiveness research
Culture
Democracy
Disaster response
Health care institutions
HIV/AIDS
Kyoto Protocol
Population health
State-building
Biosecurity
Business
Demographics
Diabetes
Elections
Health policy
Media
World Bank
Aquaculture
Bioterrorism
Cleantech
Coal
Discrimination
Disease
Health Care Reform
Human Rights
Investment
Military
Protectionism
World Trade Organization
Diplomacy
Economic Affairs
Electricity
Global Health
Homeland Security
Information Technology
Intelligence
NATO
Civil Wars
Climate
Education
Energy and Climate Policy
Ethnicity
Foreign Aid
Health Care
Institutions and Organizations
Negotiation
Climate change
Conflict
Energy Infrastructure
Entrepreneurship
Foreign Policy
Gender
Health Outcomes
Peacekeeping
Policy Analysis
Energy Services
Food Markets
History
Migration and Citizenship
Crime
Cybersecurity
Deforestation
Fossil Fuels
Islam
Nutrition
Trade
Fisheries
Food Security
Public Health
Drug trafficking
Hunger
Natural gas
Publication Series
Shorenstein APARC Studies with Stanford University Press
Innovation
Nuclear Energy
Religion
Nuclear policy
Poverty
Natural Resources
Renewable Resources
Science and Technology
Kidnapping
Oil
Water
Sustainable development
Missiles
Nuclear Risk
Nuclear Safety
Terrorism
Torture convention
Violence
Governance
International Relations
Health and Medicine
International Development
Security
Energy
Environment
Society
Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center
Center for Health Policy / Department of Health Policy
Center for International Security and Cooperation
Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law
Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies
The Europe Center
Center on Food Security and the Environment
Stanford Center at Peking University
Bechtel Conference Center At Encina Hall
Internal Center (Content Staging)
Cyber Center
Center on China’s Economy and Institutions
Program on Energy and Sustainable Development
Korea Program
Southeast Asia Program
Stanford Program on Regions of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
China Program
Stanford Program on International and Cross-Cultural Education
Global Affiliates Program
Asia Health Policy Program
Program on Human Rights
Rural Education Action Program
Arab Reform and Development Program
Draper Hills Summer Fellows Program
Program on Poverty and Governance
Japan Program
Stanford International Crime and Violence Lab
Austrian and Central European Program
European Governance
Europe and the Global Economy
Migration
France and the Francophone World
Iberian Studies Program
Industrial Affiliates Program
Program on American Democracy in Comparative Perspective
Taiwan Program
GDPI
Student Programs
Global Populisms
Ford Dorsey Master's Program in International Policy
Texas and Florida are telling the Supreme Court that their social media laws are like civil rights laws prohibiting discrimination against minority groups. They’re wrong.
Objective: The measures implemented to control the spread of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could affect children’s mental and vision health. Youth particularly from minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds were more likely to be impacted by these measures. This study aimed to examine the mental health of children with vision impairment and associated factors in North-western China during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 2,036 secondary school children living in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Participants completed a survey on sociodemographic and lifestyle information and answered the Chinese version of the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) questionnaire. Presenting visual acuity was measured by a trained enumerator. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors for mental health problems.
Results: Responses from 1,992 (97.8%) children were included in the analysis after excluding those with incomplete mental health outcome data. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms within the dataset were 28.9, 46.4, and 22.3%, respectively. The distribution of children with different stress levels differed significantly between those with and without vision impairment (p = 0.03). Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that depression symptoms decreased with higher parental education (OR, 0.76, 95% confidence intervals (CI):0.63–0.96), longer sleep duration (OR, 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81–0.97) and longer study time (OR, 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74–0.91), whereas they increased with higher recreational screen time (OR, 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08–1.32). Anxiety symptoms decreased with higher parental education (OR, 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66–0.96) and increased with higher recreational screen time (OR, 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04–1.27) and being a left-behind child (OR, 1.26, 95% CI: 1.04–1.54). In addition, stress symptoms decreased with longer sleep duration (OR, 0.92, 95%CI: 0.85–0.99) and increased with higher number of siblings (OR, 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01–1.19), higher recreational screen time (OR, 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04–1.28) and older age (OR,1.12, 95% CI: 1.004–1.24).
Conclusion: A considerable proportion of our sample experienced mental health problems during the pandemic. Healthcare planners in China should consider interventions such as reducing recreational screen time, ensuring sufficient sleep, and timely detection of mental health symptoms among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.
A proposed system intended to respond to the criticism that software security is context dependent, to minimize the cost of litigation, and to incentivize improvements in software security.
Flourishing is an evolving wellbeing construct and outcome of interest across the social and biological sciences. Despite some conceptual advancements, there remains limited consensus on how to measure flourishing, as well as how to distinguish it from closely related wellbeing constructs, such as thriving and life satisfaction. This paper aims to provide an overview and comparison of the diverse scales that have been developed to measure flourishing among adolescent and adult populations to provide recommendations for future studies seeking to use flourishing as an outcome in social and biological research. We find that most common scales used to measure flourishing are multi-dimensional and assess features over monthly or yearly intervals, and many have been translated and validated across multiple geographical contexts, including higher- and lower-income countries. Complementing self-report measures with other social, economic, regional, and biological indicators of flourishing may provide a holistic and widely applicable measure of wellbeing that could guide strategies to sustain flourishing societies.
Despite the proliferation of education technologies (EdTech) in education, past reviews that examine their effectiveness in the context of low- and middle-income countries are few and rarely seek to include studies published in languages other than English. This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of educational technology on primary and secondary student learning outcomes in China via a systematic search of both English- and Chinese-language databases. Eighteen (18) unique studies in 21 manuscripts on the effectiveness of EdTech innovations in China met the eligibility criteria. The majority of these evaluate computer aided self-led learning software packages designed to improve student learning (computer assisted learning, CAL), while the rest evaluate the use of education technology to improve classroom instruction (ICI) and remote instruction (RI). The pooled effect size of all included studies indicates a small, positive effect on student learning (0.13 SD, 95% CI [0.10, 0.17]). CAL used a supplement to existing educational inputs – which made up the large majority of positive effect sizes – and RI programs consistently showed positive and significant effects on learning. Our findings indicate no significant differences or impacts on the overall effect based on moderating variables such as the type of implementation approach, contextual setting, or school subject area. Taken together, while there is evidence of the positive impacts of two kinds of EdTech (supplemental computer assisted learning and remote instruction) in China, more evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of other approaches.
Despite rapid economic growth in China since 1978, rural-urban inequality has widened. High levels of socioeconomic inequality can have profound implications for child development and lifelong educational equity. Using a dataset containing early childhood development (ECD) outcomes of 0- to 3-year-olds (N = 9,053) from study sites in Eastern, Central, and Western China, the study finds that the risks of cognitive, language, and motor delay are, respectively, 43.2, 18.3, and 20.7 percentage points higher in rural study sites than in urban Shanghai (ps < .01). Impact evaluation of cluster-randomized experiments shows that parental training (focusing on child psychosocial stimulation and caregiver-child interaction) can improve parenting beliefs and practices (or investments) and ECD outcomes of disadvantaged rural children (p < .01). Such programs can play an important role in advancing progress toward more social equality and economic equity, the stated goals of China’s “Common Prosperity” policy.
Keywords: early childhood development, Common Prosperity, rural-urban inequality, intergenerational transmission of disadvantage, parental training, parenting beliefs and practices
With the New START Treaty supended by the Russian Federation the future of legal nuclear arms control looks even bleaker than before. This brief lays out the foundations of the treaty and the main obstacles that it faces even before it expires in 2026.
