-

About the event: America’s Founding Fathers feared that a standing army would be a permanent political danger, yet the US military has in the 250 years since become a bulwark of democracy. Kori Schake explains why in this compelling history of civil-military relations from independence to the challenges of the present.

The book begins with General George Washington’s vital foundational example of subordination to elected leaders during the Revolutionary War. Schake recounts numerous instances in the following century when charismatic military leaders tried to challenge political leaders and explains the emergence of restrictions on uses of the military for domestic law enforcement. She explores the crucial struggle between President Andrew Johnson and Congress after Abraham Lincoln’s assassination, when Ulysses Grant had to choose whether to obey the commander in chief or the law—and chose to obey the law. And she shows how the professionalization of the military in the 20th century inculcated norms of civilian control.

The US military is historically anomalous for maintaining its strength and popularity while never becoming a threat to democracy. Schake concludes by asking if its admirable record can be sustained when the public is pulling the military into the political divisions of our time.

About the speaker: Kori Schake leads the foreign and defense policy team at the American Enterprise Institute. She is the author of Safe Passage: the Transition from British to American Hegemony, and a contributing writer at The Atlantic, War on the Rocks, and Bloomberg.

 All CISAC events are scheduled using the Pacific Time Zone.

No filming or recording without express permission from speaker.

William J. Perry Conference Room

Kori Schake
Seminars
Date Label
-
Opening slide for talk with Ying Xu

Join the Tech Impact and Policy Center on May 26th from 12PM–1PM Pacific for a seminar with Ying Xu.

Stanford affiliates are invited to join us at 11:40 AM for lunch, prior to the seminar.  The Spring Seminar Series continues through May; see our Spring Seminar Series page for speakers and topics. Sign up for our newsletter for announcements. 

About the Seminar:

This talk will focus on the role and impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on children’s cognitive and social development. It will highlight how children interact with, perceive, and learn from AI systems, including how they develop trust in these “AI companions.” The talk will also discuss emerging evidence and open questions regarding how generative AI tools shape children’s curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking. It will conclude with a discussion of how social science researchers can amplify their collective voice to ensure that AI is developed and implemented in ways that are safe and beneficial for children.
 

About the Speaker:

Ying Xu is an Assistant Professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Her research examines how artificial intelligence may support or hinder children’s cognitive development, academic achievement, and social-emotional well-being. Her work aims to inform evidence-based practices and policies to ensure that AI serves as a positive force in child and youth development while mitigating potential risks. She earned her Ph.D. in Language, Literacy, and Technology from the University of California, Irvine. Prior to joining Harvard, she was an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences and Technology at the University of Michigan.
 

McClatchy Hall, S40 Studio
450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305

For those attending the in-person seminar, please bring your Stanford ID card/mobile ID to enter the building. 

Ying Xu Assistant Professor of Education Harvard University
Seminars

AI and the Developing Child: Myths, Evidence, and Open Questions

News Feed Image
052626_ying_xu.png
Date Label
-
title slide for talk

Join the Tech Impact and Policy Center on May 12th from 12PM–1PM Pacific for a seminar with Jennifer Heifferon & Alanna Powers-O'Brien.

Stanford affiliates are invited to join us at 11:40 AM for lunch, prior to the seminar.  The Spring Seminar Series continues through May; see our Spring Seminar Series page for speakers and topics. Sign up for our newsletter for announcements. 

About the Seminar:

As adolescence becomes increasingly digital, public discourse tends to focus on screen time, platform design, and online harms. Yet alongside these concerns, a parallel transformation has unfolded: the steady erosion of physical spaces meant for teens. What happens to youth social life when the outside world contracts? This talk argues that the rise of digital adolescence must be understood alongside the decline of third places—low-barrier environments beyond home and school that once supported informal peer culture and autonomy. Drawing on original statewide data from caregiver focus groups and a survey of more than 1,000 teens, we examine how young people navigate belonging amid shrinking real-world options. By reframing youth technology use as intertwined with social infrastructure, this research raises a new policy question: What would it mean to treat third places as essential civic infrastructure for youth in a digital age?
 

About the Speaker:

Jennifer Heifferon is the Child Well-Being Program Director at the California Partners Project, where she leads research and cross-sector initiatives focused on youth development in a digital age. Her work examines how technology, family systems, and community environments intersect to shape adolescent well-being, with an emphasis on translating lived experience and empirical research into insights for families, educators, and civic decision-makers. Jennifer’s background bridges K–12 education as a teacher, learning specialist, and equity leader, formal training and facilitation in diversity, equity, and inclusion, and ongoing leadership in youth sports coaching. Prior to her work in education, she worked in digital media as an interactive producer. She holds a BA in Psychology from Stanford University and an MA in Teaching from the University of San Francisco.
 

Alanna Powers-O'Brien is the Research Specialist for the Family Online Safety Institute, managing FOSI's research projects. She is passionate about creating safer experiences for kids and families online. Alanna has created several resources and managed research projects that focus on informing parents, educators and other stakeholders about concepts such as digital literacy, wellbeing and AI. Her prior experiences were in both media and education. Alanna has taught English and communications courses at both the high school and college level, and concentrated on the subject of media literacy education during her master’s program. Alanna has a master’s degree in Media Studies from the Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. She also holds undergraduate degrees in both Public Relations and English from Penn State University, and is a Fulbright alumna.
 

McClatchy Hall, S40 Studio
450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305

For those attending the in-person seminar, please bring your Stanford ID card/mobile ID to enter the building. 

Jennifer Heifferon Program Director, Child Well-Being California Partners Project
Alanna Powers-O'Brien Research Scientist Family Online Safety Institute
Seminars

Belonging in a Digital Age: Teens, Tech, & Third Places

News Feed Image
051226_jen_heifferon_and_alanna_powers-obrien.png
Date Label
-
Opening slide for talk with Jonathan Stray

Join the Tech Impact and Policy Center on April 21st from 12PM–1PM Pacific for a seminar with Jonathan Stray.

Stanford affiliates are invited to join us at 11:40 AM for lunch, prior to the seminar.  The Spring Seminar Series continues through May; see our Spring Seminar Series page for speakers and topics. Sign up for our newsletter for announcements. 

About the Seminar:

There has been much discussion of how AI can help humans cooperate, but much less about what happens when you add AI to humans who disagree -- potentially violently. Social media systems, which are increasingly AI driven, may amplify divisive or escalatory narratives. LLMs may similarly exacerbate conflict, especially if they give different answers to people on different sides. I'll present recent work testing alternative social media algorithms with real users on real platforms in an attempt to reduce polarization around the 2024 election, and using LLMs to produce "politically neutral" answers on maximally controversial topics. These early experiments give us a glimpse into the turbulent future of AI-mediated conflict.
 

About the Speaker:

Jonathan Stray is a Senior Scientist at the Center for Human-compatible AI at UC Berkeley, where he works on the design of AI-driven media with a particular interest in well-being and conflict. Previously, he taught the dual masters degree in computer science and journalism at Columbia University, worked as an editor at the Associated Press, and built document mining software for investigative journalism.
 

McClatchy Hall, S40 Studio
450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305

For those attending the in-person seminar, please bring your Stanford ID card/mobile ID to enter the building. 

Jonathan Stray Senior Scientist UC Berkeley Center for Human Compatible AI
Seminars

AI Can Make Conflict Worse or Better

News Feed Image
042126_jonathan_stray.png
Date Label
-
Opening slide for talk with david figlio

Join the Tech Impact and Policy Center on April 14th from 12PM–1PM Pacific for a seminar with David Figlio.

Stanford affiliates are invited to join us at 11:40 AM for lunch, prior to the seminar.  The Spring Seminar Series continues through May; see our Spring Seminar Series page for speakers and topics. Sign up for our newsletter for announcements. 

About the Seminar:

Cellphone bans in schools have become a popular policy in recent years in the United States, yet very little is known about their effects on student outcomes. In this study, we try to fill this gap by examining the causal effects of bans on student test scores, suspensions, and absences using detailed student-level data from Florida and a quasi-experimental research strategy relying upon differences in pre-ban cellphone use by students, as measured by building-level Advan data. Several important findings emerge. First, we show that the enforcement of cellphone bans in schools led to a significant increase in student suspensions in the short-term, especially among Black students, but disciplinary actions began to dissipate after the first year, potentially suggesting a new steady state after an initial adjustment period. Second, we find significant improvements in student test scores in the second year of the ban after that initial adjustment period. Third, the findings suggest that cellphone bans in schools significantly reduce student unexcused absences, an effect that may explain a large fraction of the test score gains. The effects of cellphone bans are more pronounced in middle and high school settings where student smartphone ownership is more common.    

About the Speaker:

David Figlio is the Gordon Fyfe Professor of Economics at the University of Rochester, a Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution, and a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research. His research on education policy, the economics of the family, the interaction between early health and human development, and the economics publication process has been published over the past five years in leading journals such as the American Economic Review, Journal of Political Economy, Review of Economic Studies, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, Journal of Human Resources, Journal of Labor Economics, and Economic Journal. He recently served as provost at the University of Rochester and dean of Northwestern University’s School of Education and Social Policy. An elected member of the National Academy of Education, he has served as editor of the Journal of Human Resources and inaugural editor of Education Finance and Policy, and has advised numerous states and countries on education policy.    

McClatchy Hall, S40 Studio
450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305

For those attending the in-person seminar, please bring your Stanford ID card/mobile ID to enter the building. 

David Figlio Gordon Fyfe Professor of Economics University of Rochester
Seminars

The Impact of Cellphone Bans in Schools on Student Outcomes: Evidence from Florida

News Feed Image
041426_david_figlio.png
Date Label
-
Opening slide for talk with Robie Torney

Join the Tech Impact and Policy Center on April 7th from 12PM–1PM Pacific for a seminar with Robbie Torney.

Stanford affiliates are invited to join us at 11:40 AM for lunch, prior to the seminar.  The Spring Seminar Series continues through May; see our Spring Seminar Series page for speakers and topics. Sign up for our newsletter for announcements. 

About the Seminar:

As AI products rapidly integrate into the lives of kids and teens, from educational tools to companion chatbots, the technology industry faces fundamental questions about how to design and deploy these systems responsibly. Drawing on three years of risk assessments conducted by the nonprofit Common Sense Media across major AI platforms including ChatGPT, Gemini, Meta AI, Grok, and numerous AI companion services, this talk examines what we've learned about the gap between current AI design and kid and teen safety. This presentation will outline our approach for evaluating developmental appropriateness in AI systems. Through concrete examples from platform evaluations, we’ll explore patterns we find in safeguarding young users, including in providing “advice” on a range of topics, mental health topics, and more traditional challenges around age appropriate content. These findings reveal structural challenges in how AI products are currently conceived and deployed for young people, from design assumptions that ignore developmental differences to business models that prioritize engagement over safety. Finally, we’ll discuss implications for AI development, deployment, and policy, including the role of age assurance, emerging regulatory approaches, and what product standards for developmental appropriateness might look like in practice.
 

About the Speaker:

Robbie Torney (BA '09, MA '10) is Head of AI & Digital Assessments at Common Sense Media, where he leads the organization's AI safety research and risk assessment methodology. Under his leadership, Common Sense has developed and conducted systematic risk assessments of major AI platforms including ChatGPT, Gemini, Meta AI, and Grok, as well as emerging categories like AI companion chatbots and AI toys. His work spans research, policy advocacy, and industry engagement. He has testified before Congress and the California Legislature on AI safety for youth and works directly with technology companies to shape industry standards. His research focuses on evaluating AI systems through frameworks that center developmental appropriateness and child safety by design. Prior to joining Common Sense Media, Robbie spent over a decade in education leadership in Oakland, California, bringing practical understanding of how technology affects children and families to questions of AI policy and responsible development.
 

McClatchy Hall, S40 Studio
450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305

For those attending the in-person seminar, please bring your Stanford ID card/mobile ID to enter the building. 

Robbie Torney Head of AI & Digital Assessments Common Sense Media
Seminars

What Three Years of AI Risk Assessments Teach Us About Safety by Design for Kids and Teens

News Feed Image
040726_robbie_torney.png
Date Label
-

About the event: The Women, Peace and Security sector advocates for the inclusion of designated gender experts in peace processes to improve outcomes for women. However, empirical support for their effectiveness remains inconclusive. This talk questions whether gender experts are influential or ineffective advocates for women. While their explicit commitment to gendered issues may benefit women, the overt femininity of the role may disadvantage their capacity in overtly masculine security spaces. Leveraging an original dataset capturing the role of 2299 delegates across 116 comprehensive peace agreements finalized between 1990 and 2021, we find that gender experts increase the likelihood that agreements contain provisions for women. However, interviews and archival analysis suggest that the systemic structure of peace negotiations constrains gender experts’ overall influence. Consequently, we explain how gender experts are simultaneously powerful and powerless. Findings capture gender experts’ limitations, caution against policy that makes gender experts solely responsible for gendered considerations in peace processes, and contribute to understanding gendered power dynamics in negotiations more broadly.

About the speaker: Elizabeth is a CISAC Postdoctoral Fellow and previously held fellowships at Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center, Harvard Law School’s Program on Negotiation, the US Institute of Peace, Northwestern University’s Buffett Institute for Global Affairs, and Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Her research focuses on Women, Peace and Security, and explores power dynamics in peace negotiations. Her work has been published in the American Political Science Review. Elizabeth holds a Ph.D. from Northwestern University and she previously worked as a Gender Specialist with the UN in Kosovo and as a Gender Consultant for USAID in Ghana.

 All CISAC events are scheduled using the Pacific Time Zone.

No filming or recording without express permission from speaker.

William J. Perry Conference Room

Elizabeth Good
Seminars
Date Label
-
The Drivers and Consequences of the International Mobility of Healthcare Professionals from the Philippines

The Philippines is one of the top exporters of healthcare professionals in the world, and arguably a leader in providing high-quality healthcare professionals to regional and global healthcare systems facing workforce shortages. In the last four decades, about 74,000 healthcare professionals emigrated, of which 84% were professional nurses, and around 13,000 newly-hired nurses were deployed annually as temporary migrant workers whose annual remittances averaged US$308,000 (2018-2021). 

This research aims to examine the consequences and drivers of international mobility of health professionals from the Philippines, particularly the role of climate change, given that the country is ranked third globally in terms of vulnerability to climate change risks. While still in its nascent stage, this research first explores the net effects and policy implications of migration using evidence and frameworks found in recent literature. The exodus of high-skilled workers may result in “brain drain”, shortages, and unequal distribution of skilled health workers across the country; however, “brain gain” is also possible. Human capital may improve when: remittances are used for education; more Filipinos are induced to study nursing; and migrants return with new skills and work experience.

Speaker: Marjorie Pajaron is currently a Visiting Scholar for the spring quarter of 2026 and Associate Professor at the School of Economics, University of the Philippines (UP), Diliman. Prior to her appointment, she was a Postdoctoral Fellow at Stanford University’s Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center. She also served as a lecturer at the University of Hawai’i at Manoa Department of Economics, where she received her Ph.D., and she was a Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Manchester's Global Development Institute.

Her published research includes topics on health, migration, climate change, and remote sensing. She was the recipient of the UP Centennial Professorial Chair Award and International Publication Award for four years,  and she has also served as an Associate Editor for the Scopus-listed journal SciEnggJ

Karen Eggleston
Karen Eggleston, Director of the Stanford Asia Health Policy Program

Philippines Conference Room
Encina Hall, Third Floor, Central, C330
616 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305

Marjorie Pajaron, Visiting Scholar, Spring 2026, Shorenstein APARC, Stanford University
Seminars
Date Label
-

About the event: The Baltic states keep surprising researchers — and that is why they are worth studying. They survived the Global Financial Crisis without devaluing their currencies and recovered quickly, even though many economists expected them to fail. Estonia did better than its neighbors during that crisis, and this could not be explained by economic factors alone — political trust turned out to matter. Now, Lithuania has overtaken Estonia in per capita income, which few predicted, and which remains to be explained. The Baltic puzzles are not just regional curiosities. They point to open questions in political economy and security studies.

Kuokštis’ current research focuses on NATO burden-sharing. The standard story is that allies spend too little on defense because others will cover for them — but whether this actually happens, and how, is less clear than conventional wisdom suggests. He examines allied defense spending patterns using difference-in-differences methods, and separately runs a survey experiment in Lithuania testing whether the visible presence of allied forces changes how citizens view allied commitment and how much they are willing to spend on defense. Lithuania is a crucial case for this question: Germany has committed to stationing a full permanent brigade there, creating a real-world experiment that most NATO countries never experience. Can European power substitute for — or does it complement — American security guarantees? The answer matters a great deal for how alliances actually hold together.

About the speaker: Vytautas Kuokštis is an associate professor at Vilnius University's Institute of International Relations and Political Science (TSPMI), visiting Stanford's CISAC during 2025–26. His research spans international political economy and security, focusing on exchange rate regimes, labor market institutions, NATO burden-sharing, and fintech regulation. At CISAC, he is designing a survey experiment examining how changes in NATO allies' defense commitments shape Lithuanian public preferences on defense spending. He has published in journals including Political Science Research and Methods, European Journal of Political Economy, and JCMS. He previously held research positions at Harvard (Fulbright), Yale, and Hokkaido University.

 All CISAC events are scheduled using the Pacific Time Zone.

No filming or recording without express permission from speaker.

William J. Perry Conference Room

Vytautas Kuokštis
Seminars
Date Label
-

This event is hosted by the Indo-Pacific Policy Lab.

In-person registration is at full capacity and now closed. Online registration is still available.

About the event: In Retrench, Defend, Compete, Charles L. Glaser advances a thought-provoking strategy for securing vital US interests in the face of China's rise.

 

CISAC book talk

Many believe China's ascent will drive it to war with the United States. Yet this is far from inevitable; geography and nuclear weapons should ensure US security. The real danger, Glaser contends, lies in East Asia's territorial disputes, especially over Taiwan. To reduce the risk of war, Glaser makes a bold case for ending US security commitments to Taiwan and carefully calibrating its policies on protecting South China Sea maritime features. The United States should also strengthen its alliances with Japan and South Korea and eliminate unnecessarily provocative nuclear and conventional weapons policies. These measures, Glaser argues, would defuse China's biggest security concerns while preserving America's core strategic interests.

Fusing theoretical insights with policy analysis, Retrench, Defend, Compete lays out a distinctive and compelling approach for managing the world's most consequential geopolitical rivalry—before it's too late.

About the speaker: Charles L. Glaser is a Senior Fellow in the MIT Security Studies Program and Professor Emeritus of Political Science and International Affairs at George Washington University. He was the Founding Director of the Elliott School's Institute for Security and Conflict Studies.

Glaser studies international relations theory and international security policy. His research focuses on defensive realism and deterrence theory, as well as U.S. security policy regarding China, nuclear weapons, and energy security.

His books include Retrench, Defend, Compete: Securing America’s Future Against a Rising China, Rational Theory of International Politics and Analyzing Strategic Nuclear Policy; and two co-edited volumes—Managing U.S. Nuclear Operations in the 21st Century and Crude Strategy.

 All CISAC events are scheduled using the Pacific Time Zone.

No filming or recording without express permission from speaker.

William J. Perry Conference Room

Charles Glaser
Seminars
Date Label
Subscribe to Seminars