Business
Paragraphs
Cover of the book "The Four Talent Giants"

The Asia-Pacific region has seen extraordinary economic achievements. Japan's post-World War II transformation into an economic powerhouse challenging US dominance by the late 1980s was miraculous. China's rise as the world's second-largest economy is one of the 21st century's most stunning stories. India, now a top-five economy by GDP, is rapidly ascending. Despite its small population, Australia ranked among the top ten GDP nations in 1960 and has remained resilient. While cultivating, attracting, and leveraging talent has been crucial to growth in these countries, their approaches have varied widely, reflecting significant cultural, historical, and institutional differences.

In this sweeping analysis of talent development strategies, Gi-Wook Shin investigates how these four "talent giants'' achieved economic power and sustained momentum by responding to risks and challenges such as demographic crises, brain drain, and geopolitical tensions. This book offers invaluable insights for policymakers and is essential for scholars, students, and readers interested in understanding the dynamics of talent and economic growth in the Asia-Pacific region and beyond.

This title is forthcoming in July 2025.

Advance praise for The Four Talent Giants:

"The Four Talent Giants is a wonderful book, full of new ideas and, especially, comparative empirical research. Gi-Wook Shin's ambitious treatment of the topic of human capital, or 'talent,' in the context of a globalized economy is very important and reading it will be a rewarding exercise for scholars, politicians, corporate leaders, and many others."
—Nirvikar Singh, University of California, Santa Cruz

"The current scholarly literature offers multiple country-specific talent formation studies, including those on the transformative role of skilled migration. However, few authors have dared to attempt a thorough cross-national analysis, comparing the nature and impact of policies across highly variable geopolitical contexts. The Four Talent Giants achieves this goal triumphantly, and accessibly, assessing the global implications of national experimentation for effective talent portfolio management."
—Lesleyanne Hawthorne, University of Melbourne
 

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Books
Publication Date
Subtitle

National Strategies for Human Resource Development Across Japan, Australia, China, and India

Authors
Gi-Wook Shin
Book Publisher
Stanford University Press
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

A growing body of literature explores the effect of higher education on the urban–rural divide in China. Despite an increasing number of rural students gaining access to college, little is known about their performance in college or their job prospects after graduation. Using nationally representative data from over 40,000 urban and rural college students, we examine rural students’ college performance and estimate the impact of rural status on students’ first job wages in comparison to their urban peers. Our results indicate that once accepted into college, rural students perform equally as well, if not better, than their urban counterparts. Additionally, we discovered that rural students earn a 6.2 per cent wage premium compared to their urban counterparts in their first job after graduation. Our findings suggest the importance of expanding access to higher education for rural students, as it appears to serve as an equalizer between urban and rural students despite their significantly different backgrounds.

Journal Publisher
The China Quarterly
Authors
Huan Wang
Huan Wang
Claire Cousineau
Claire Cousineau
Matthew Boswell
Matthew Boswell
Hongbin Li
Hongbin Li
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

We estimate the wage premium associated with having a cadre parent in China using a recent survey of college graduates carried out by the authors. The wage premium of having a cadre parent is 15%, and this premium cannot be explained by other observables such as college entrance exam scores, quality of colleges and majors, a full set of college human capital attributes, and job characteristics. These results suggest that the remaining premium could be the true wage premium of having a cadre parent.

Journal Publisher
Journal of Development Economics
Authors
Hongbin Li
Hongbin Li
Lingsheng Meng
Lingsheng Meng
Xinzheng Shi
Binzhen Wu
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

This paper empirically investigates the labor market effects of China’s 2007 VAT reform, which significantly reduced the tax cost of capital investment. Employing city-by-year variation in the reform, we demonstrate that the tax cuts increased the earnings of skilled workers and left the earnings of the unskilled workers unaffected. Moreover, we find limited impacts of the reform on employment for both skill groups. These results suggest that the tax incentives increased the relative demand for skills, thus resulting in a higher income inequality between skilled and unskilled workers.

Journal Publisher
Labour Economics
Authors
Hongbin Li
Hongbin Li
Lingsheng Meng
Lingsheng Meng
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

China’s college admission increased by five times between 1998 and 2009. While the college premium for young workers declined, that for senior workers increased in this period. In our general equilibrium model, a rising demand for skills (education and experience) explains both trends. A demand shock leads to an expansion in the elastic college enrollment, depressing the college premium for young workers. With an inelastic supply, experienced college graduates continue to enjoy a rising premium. Despite the low immediate premium, young individuals continue to flood into colleges because they foresee high lifetime returns. Simulations match empirical results well.

Journal Publisher
The Journal of Human Resources
Authors
Hongbin Li
Hongbin Li
James Liang
Binzhen Wu
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

Despite private enterprises dominating China's labour market, college-educated workers are still highly concentrated in the state sector. Using data from the Chinese College Student Survey, we find that 64 per cent of students in the sample expressed a strong preference for state sector employment. We also identify several factors associated with receiving job offers from the state sector, including being male, holding urban hukou status, being a member of the CCP, performing well on standardized tests, attending elite universities and having higher household income or high-status parental backgrounds. These findings suggest that despite China's economic transition, the private sector may still struggle to attract highly educated workers.

Journal Publisher
The China Quarterly
Authors
Hongbin Li
Hongbin Li
Lingsheng Meng
Lingsheng Meng
Yanyan Xiong
Sinclair L. Cook
All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subtitle

A country’s national income broadly depends on the quantity and quality of workers and capital. But how well these factors are managed within and between firms may be a key determinant of a country’s productivity and its GDP. Although social scientists have long studied the role of management practices in shaping business performance, their primary tool has been individual case studies. While useful for theory-building, such qualitative work is hard to scale and quantify. We present a large, scalable dataset measuring structured management practices at the business level across multiple countries. We measure practices related to performance monitoring, target-setting, and human resources. We document a set of key stylized facts, which we label “the international empirics of management”. In all countries, firms with more structured practices tend to also have superior economic performance: they are larger in scale, are more profitable, have higher labor productivity and are more likely to export. This consistency was not obvious ex-ante, and being able to quantify these relationships is valuable. We also document significant variation in practices across and within countries, which is important in explaining differences in the wealth of nations. The positive relationship between firm size and structured management practices is stronger in countries with more open and free markets, suggesting that stronger competition may allow firms with more structured management practices to grow larger, thereby potentially raising aggregate national income.

Journal Publisher
PNAS
Authors
Daniela Scur
Scott Ohlmacher
John Van Reenen
Morten Bennedsen
Nick Bloom
Ali Choudhary
Lucia Foster
Jesse Groenewegen
Arti Grover
Sjoerd Hardeman
Leonardo Iacovone
Marie-Christine Laible
Renata Lemos
Hongbin Li
Hongbin Li
Andrea Linarello
Mika Maliranta
Denis Medvedev
Charlotte Meng
John Miles Touya
Natalia Mandirola
Roope Ohlsbom
Atsushi Ohyama
Megha Patnaik
Mariana Pereira-Lopez
Raffaella Sadun
Tatsuro Senga
Franklin Qian
Florian Zimmermann
Authors
Lisa Sanchez-Corea Simpson
News Type
News
Date
Paragraphs

On April 1, Stanford University formally launched a new Program on Capitalism and Democracy (CAD), a collaboration between the Corporations and Society Initiative (CASI) at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) under the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies (FSI).

The program was unveiled by Jon Levin, the recently appointed incoming President of Stanford University who currently serves as Dean of the Graduate School of Business, alongside Kathryn Stoner, the Mosbacher Director of CDDRL. In his remarks, Dean Levin highlighted that CAD will "be centered exactly at the intersection of business decision-making, policymaking, and the foundations of democratic institutions." He commended the work of CASI and its founder, Anat Admati, for rigorously pursuing research on "inconvenient issues that we have often chosen to avoid or ignore" related to the role of corporations in society.

Kathryn Stoner further elaborated that "the program on Capitalism and Democracy will explore the complex interactions between democratic institutions, markets, and private sector participants." She indicated the initiative will examine a broad range of topics, noting that "sometimes corporations are causes for good and sometimes corporations may undermine the resilience and quality of democracy."

To mark the launch, CAD convened a discussion involving Professor Larry Diamond, the Mosbacher Senior Fellow in Global Democracy at FSI, Anat Admati, Professor of Finance and Economics at the GSB, and Global Witness Co-Founder Patrick Alley. Together, they focused on how the dynamics of capitalism don’t always align well with the principles of democracy. In their remarks, they addressed critical concerns such as the erosion of global democratic norms, a lack of good governance, rampant corruption, and “predatory capitalism.” They offered their insights into the challenges involved when both economic and political frameworks are of first-order importance but must be addressed in an environment of declining trust in institutions.

Admati opened by rejecting “false dichotomies” that frame the issues as stark choices between “capitalism and socialism” or “free markets and regulation.” She observed that capitalism can be thought of as “a set of markets that have institutions that are private sector based” but emphasized that “the private sector needs the government to protect its rights and to enforce its contracts. When you have markets at scale with people who don't know each other, you need institutions. You need contracts and contract enforcement.”

Larry Diamond, who has done extensive research on democratic trends and conditions around the world, brought up the paradox of the “resource curse,” the phenomenon by which developing nations with valuable natural resources often experience declines in democratic institutions as the proceeds from selling the resources get caught up in webs of corruption rather than being justly distributed for the benefit of the wider population. He claimed that “corruption and kleptocracy are at the core of underdevelopment in the world.”

Patrick Alley’s experiences at Global Witness made him very aware of corrupt politicians taking bribes from multinational oil companies. He recounted how “the politician takes money, and now their allegiance is inevitably shifting away from the electorate to their new money suppliers… so they'll start building a heavy mob around them, put big walls on the palace … and retreat into that. They don't want to lose the next election because this is going very nicely for them.” Alley summed up the cycle of corruption and concluded that “the democratic process is going to be screwed from within -- and you end up with autocracy.”

The discussion turned to exposing the role of enablers play in the persistence of systemic corruption. Enablers of corruption are not those who directly participate in illicit activities but rather are members of a “pinstripe army” (in Alley’s parlance) composed of platoons of bankers, lawyers, and accountants in global financial centers who facilitate illicit flows of money around the world. He observed that “corruption is a global industry.”

Acknowledging that corporations can be instrumental in driving economic prosperity and innovation, Admati reflected on her experience exposing the inadequacy of laws and regulatory tools that should place limits on the “pinstripe army,” She drew a sharp distinction between the private sector as “the engine of growth and the engine of innovation” and “financialized capitalism … the capitalism that is undermining democracy, the type we want to push back against. Once democracy asserts itself properly then we will be able to get the gains of capitalism.”

Diamond closed the conference by endorsing “individual enterprise and initiative—honestly earned, transparently conducted, rule-of-law-minded, with concern for the community. It's predatory capitalism that runs amok and breaks free of transparency and democratic regulation, that threatens fairness, human well-being, and democracy itself.”

CAD will be led by Prof. Anat Admati, with the support of Prof. Larry Diamond, Dr. Didi Kuo, Center Fellow at FSI, and Dr. Francis Fukuyama, Oliver Nomellini Senior Fellow at FSI.

Read More

Program on Capitalism and Democracy logo on white bar over crowd of people with transparent overlay of global currencies
News

Examining the Dynamics of Corporate Power: CDDRL Launches New Program on Capitalism and Democracy

Led by Professor Anat Admati, the program explores how capitalism interacts with democratic institutions and how a better balance between them might be achieved.
cover link Examining the Dynamics of Corporate Power: CDDRL Launches New Program on Capitalism and Democracy
Anat Admati
News

How Banking Undermines Democracy

In a recent CDDRL research seminar, Anat Admati shared findings from her research on how banking practices can undermine democracy, which are highlighted in the new and expanded edition of her book, "The Bankers’ New Clothes: What is Wrong with Banking and What to Do About It" (Princeton University Press, 2024).
cover link How Banking Undermines Democracy
All News button
1
Subtitle

The Corporations and Society Initiative (CASI) at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law at FSI collaborate to address democratic recession.

0
Lazear-Liang Postdoctoral Scholar, Stanford Graduate School of Business
wei_wei.jpg
PhD

Wei's research focuses are on China’s financial markets and its connection to the real economy. Her academic and professional endeavors are grounded in a profound interest and passion for policy-oriented research. In 2020, Wei received her PhD in finance from Tsinghua University. From 2020-2023, she worked as a postdoctoral scholar at the Becker Friedman Institute, University of Chicago.

Date Label
Paragraphs

As the Russian government seeks to improve its economic performance, it must pay greater attention to the role of technology and digitalization in stimulating the Russian economy. While digitalization presents many opportunities for the Russian economy, a few key challenges – cumbersome government regulations and an unequal playing field for foreign companies – restrict Russia's potential in digitalization. In the future, how the Russian government designs its technology and regulatory policies will likely have significant impact both on the domestic front, as well as on their international initiatives and relationships. This paper provides an overview of recent Russian digital initiatives, the regulatory barriers for U.S. technological companies in Russia, and the intellectual property challenges for doing business in Russia. This paper also discusses recent digital initiatives from China, the United States, and other countries, and discusses what such programs mean for Russia. In this context, we also discuss Chinese and U.S. efforts to shape the future of global technological standards, alongside new programs from countries like Chile and Estonia, to attract foreign startup companies. Finally, this paper discusses the future challenges that the Russian government needs to address in order to improve its digital business environment. The paper concludes by providing some recommendations for designing market-friendly regulations, creating a level-playing field for foreign businesses in Russia, promoting Russian engagement with Western companies and governments, and undertaking more outreach efforts to make Russia's digital business environment more inclusive.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Conference Memos
Publication Date
Journal Publisher
The Stanford US-Russia Journal
Authors
Dina Nasretdinova
Evgeniya Kazina
Matt Agnew
Phillipe Rodriguez
Ryan Nabil
Number
No. 1
Subscribe to Business