The importance of taking action and becoming leaders was echoed by H.R. McMaster, who delivered this year’s faculty keynote remarks.

McMaster — a retired lieutenant general in the United States Army who served as a commissioned officer for thirty-four years, including as the 26th assistant to the president for National Security Affairs — shared an anecdote with the graduates from his experience working and leading in the military:

“As a junior officer, you say to yourself, ‘Someone up there must have a plan.’ Then you are a mid-career officer, maybe a captain or a major, and you look around and the situation is disordered and units and leaders are unsure about what to do, and it dawns on you that nobody up there has a plan. Then maybe you continue to serve in the military long enough to reach senior command or the general officer ranks and you assess that your organization is unclear about its mission. Its goals and objectives are ambiguous, and people lack an understanding of the situation and how leaders expect them to work together to help achieve favorable outcomes. It is at that moment, when it should dawn on you that it is your job to make the plan.”

Continuing, McMaster turned the story back to the new alumni:

“As young leaders who hold the Ford Dorsey Master’s in International Policy degree, you are well prepared not only to make the plan, but also to implement the plan.”

Less than a week since receiving their degrees, many of the Class of 2025 graduates are already acting on McMaster’s call to step up and lead. Several members of the graduating class are either beginning or returning to careers as diplomats, embassy advisors, and public servants in Korea, Pakistan, Lebanon, and Japan. Two will be returning to military service as officers in the United States Army, while others plan to continue their academic studies in a variety of programs at Stanford and Harvard. Still others will be entering the private sector, where they will put their learning and leadership skills to use as intelligence analysts for Lockheed Martin, data scientists at the World Bank, policy associates for Linea Energy, and affiliates with Anduril Industries. Many will also continue to build or expand on AI-focused start-ups that were begun during their studies at Stanford.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

As the cohort spreads out across the globe, McMaster urged them to remember their time at Stanford and what they learned from each other in and out of the classroom:

“Do not underestimate how influential you can be and the difference you can make in our world. You will face challenges and disappointments, but your support for one another will help you keep your positive outlook on humanity and sustain your confidence.”

gaps persist between stakeholders. This is exacerbated by the lack of clear, standardized specifications from NATO, leading to inconsistent implementation and operational friction. Second, at its core, this is an intelligence-sharing challenge: member states operate under different national frameworks, threat perceptions, and priorities, which influence what information they are willing (or unwilling) to share. Third, the fragmentation of sharing systems is not merely a technical hurdle but often a deliberate choice made for operational and security reasons, reflecting concerns over sovereignty, data protection, and strategic advantage.

While technological advancements can enhance interoperability, they alone will not drive adoption. Our research highlights that the underlying issue is one of trust and incentives—NATO must establish mechanisms that encourage collaboration beyond just technological solutions. Without a strong foundation of mutual trust, transparency, and shared benefits, even the most advanced systems will face resistance. Creating sustainable incentives for participation—whether through policy alignment, risk reduction assurances, or value-added intelligence sharing—will be essential in fostering a more effective and unified cyber defense posture within NATO.

A key component of our project involves conducting in-depth research and stakeholder interviews focused on Mongolia's "Billion Trees Initiative," where we will be seeking actionable insights to scale up the initiative effectively and sustainably.

influencers work with politicians to coordinate these influence operations and shape public opinion. Our policy recommendations will address how governments and civil societies can work together to tackle this issue.

Australian Space Agency and U.S. Defense Innovation Unit, the goal of this project is to leverage Australia's strategic geographic position and investment in reentry infrastructure to mitigate the hurdles that U.S. commercial startups experience accessing military ranges for reentry. Our project aims to create a robust foundation for the development of orbital return capabilities in Australia, fostering greater commercial and national security collaboration between the U.S. and Australia.

to computational resources acts as a barrier to adoption. India has a thriving tech sector, and openly available AI models have the potential to democratize access to this trailblazing technology. At the same time, AI is expensive to build and deploy, and access to the specialized computational resources needed to do so is limited even for top Indian companies. Our team aims to develop solutions in partnership with Digital Futures Lab that can help bolster the AI ecosystem across India.

that contribute to this issue. During our fieldwork, we will explore community- and government-driven programs aimed at preventing and combating trafficking. Our final report will analyze existing policies, pinpoint gaps, and propose community-led interventions to address them.