Human Rights
-

About the event: China is practicing gray-zone coercion in the Indo-Pacific, deploying military vessels for drills in the waters between Taiwan and the Philippines. This “salami-slicing” strategy, advanced under Xi Jinping, incrementally escalates pressure on neighboring states while remaining below the threshold of open conflict. Disruption of critical sea lanes—through which fuel and food supplies transit—would have catastrophic implications for human populations dependent on uninterrupted maritime traffic. This talk presents research from the Stanford Geopolitical Coercion and Global Health Impact Initiative on maritime disruptions in the Indo-Pacific and what they would mean for human populations if maritime traffic were interrupted in a manner comparable to a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, with particular attention to effects on food security, energy access, and maternal and child health.

About the speaker: Dr. Ruth Gibson is a Visiting Scholar at the Center for Innovation in Global Health, Affiliated Scholar at CISAC and the Founding Executive Director of the Stanford Geopolitical Human Impact Research Lab—the first research initiative at Stanford University dedicated to examining how geopolitical decisions shape human lives, with particular attention to children. Based in the Department of Pediatrics at the Stanford School of Medicine, the Initiative brings together health modeling, open-source intelligence, and international humanitarian law to produce rigorous, policy-relevant scholarship. She co-leads The Lancet Series on Foreign Engagement and Health in an Era of Geopolitical Crisis with Professor Gary Darmstadt. Dr. Gibson earned her PhD in geopolitical coercion and global health from the University of British Columbia and completed postdoctoral training at Stanford’s Center for International Security and Cooperation from 2022 to 2025. Drawing on more than a decade of international global health experience across five continents, her research focuses on the health consequences of sanctions, blockades, and armed conflict, especially their effects on maternal and child health.

William J. Perry Conference Room 

0
Affiliated Scholar
Ruth Gibson Headshot PhD

Dr. Ruth Gibson serves as an affiliated scholar at the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC). Her scholarly expertise encompasses global health, foreign affairs, and strategic studies, with a particular emphasis on enhancing maternal and child health in geopolitically fragile regions—nations contending with war, sanctions, and diplomatic challenges.

Dr. Gibson is presently co-leading a Lancet series on the future of foreign aid, which scrutinizes military aid, humanitarian aid, and official development assistance. This Lancet Series investigates how these forms of foreign aid can be more effectively harnessed and integrated to fulfill their intended goals, while advancing prospects for humanity's future. She collaborates with the United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, partnering with the Special Rapporteur on Unilateral Coercive Measures to establish a universal monitoring framework for evaluating the effects of sanctions on human rights. She has contributed to reports prepared for the International Criminal Court. Dr. Gibson is a research collaborator with the Global Burden of Disease Consortium at the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, supporting efforts in global health estimation and forecasting. She is a reviewer for Nature. Her research has been published in The Lancet and The Lancet Global Health, and her insights on geopolitics and human health have featured in international media outlets, including TIME magazine.

Prior to her academic career, Dr. Gibson dedicated a decade to humanitarian and global health endeavors across eight countries on five continents. Her efforts focused on fragile states confronting poverty, human rights violations, and armed conflict. She led a humanitarian foundation in Madagascar in the aftermath of a military coup, dealing with the disintegration of the healthcare system amid international sanctions on foreign aid. While living in the Middle East, she worked for Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Health Affairs and the Health Ministries of Yemen and Somalia on telemedicine-driven medical education, as well as cultivating diplomatic relations through shared fundamental health objectives amid periods of conflict. Throughout this decade of overseas experience, Dr. Gibson directly observed the human costs of war and geopolitical coercion, an experience that informs her ongoing research.

Dr. Gibson earned an Honors Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science from the University of Toronto, a fellowship in Medical Education from the Wilson Center at the University Health Network, and a PhD in Global Health and Strategic Studies from the University of British Columbia. She completed her postdoctoral training at CISAC from 2022 to 2025. She also undertook a postdoctoral fellowship at the Center for Innovation in Global Health (CIGH), Stanford Medicine, between 2022 and 2023, where she currently holds the position of visiting scholar. She completed a postdoctoral fellowship at the Department of Health Policy, Stanford University, from 2024 to 2025. She is conversational in English, Mandarin Chinese, and French.

Date Label
Ruth Gibson
Seminars
Date Label

Encina Hall, E105
616 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford, CA 94305-6055

0
Jan Koum Israel Studies Program Postdoctoral Fellow, 2026-27
yoelheadshot_-_ben_yoel.jpg

Benjamin Yoel is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) at Stanford University. Previously, he was a Predoctoral Fellow at Johns Hopkins University's SNF Agora Institute and a visiting PhD student at the University of Chicago's Center on Democracy.

Benjamin studies democratic backsliding, nonviolent resistance, international pressure, opposition politics, and public opinion. His main research agenda focuses on the nexus of foreign pressure and opposition to democratic backsliding. Other work focuses on the broader causes and consequences of democratic backsliding as well as making different types of data more accessible to researchers and practitioners alike. His academic work has been published in Nature: Scientific Data, The International Journal of Public Opinion Research, International Affairs, and American Politics Research.

In addition to his academic research, Benjamin has consulted on projects related to democratic backsliding that have been supported by the US Department of State's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from Michigan State University and a B.A. and M.A. in Government from Reichman University.

Date Label
-
Lyuba's Hope film poster

Lyuba’s Hope follows Lyubov Sobol, a Russian anti-war opposition politician and anti-corruption figure, who has endured repeated arrests, hunger strikes, aborted political campaigns, attempted poisoning, and exile in her pursuit of a democratic post-Putin Russia.

As head of Alexei Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation, Sobol advanced pathbreaking investigations, including that of “Putin’s cook,” Prigozhin. In 2026, she was among the fifteen Russian opposition figures admitted to the European Parliament PACE program.

Lyuba, who was a 2022 Visiting Scholar at Stanford’s Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL), will join us in person for the screening of Lyuba’s Hope, along with noted Russian-American director Marianna Yarovskaya and Paul Gregory, Hoover Research Fellow and producer. Discussion will be moderated by Kathryn Stoner, Mosbacher Director of CDDRL and Satre Family Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.

Gregory and Yarovskaya’s previous film collaboration, Women of the Gulag, was shortlisted for an Academy Award in 2018.

This event is sponsored by the Hoover History Lab, in partnership with the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law, the Center for Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies, and the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures.
 

Logos for Hoover History Lab, CREEES, and CDDRL

Hauck Auditorium, David and Joan Traitel Building of the Hoover Institution
435 Lasuen Mall, Stanford (map)

Film running time: 80 mins. Discussion to follow.

Questions? Please contact rsvp-weisfeld@stanford.edu

Lyubov Sobol
Film Screenings
Date Label
Authors
Noa Ronkin
News Type
News
Date
Paragraphs

Stanford University’s Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center (APARC) is delighted to announce today, ahead of World Press Freedom Day, that Singapore-based investigative journalist Shibani Mahtani is the recipient of the 2026 Shorenstein Journalism Award for excellence in coverage of the Asia-Pacific region. The award recognizes Mahtani for her original, powerful reporting that has brought critical attention to the erosion of democracy and human rights across the region, particularly in Southeast Asia. She will receive the award at a public ceremony in the coming autumn quarter.

Until February 2026, Mahtani was an international investigative correspondent for the Washington Post. Her accountability-driven investigations across the Asia-Pacific have focused on the expanding economic and political influence of an increasingly assertive China and its implications in the region. Her work includes, among others, reports linking powerful criminal networks in Myanmar to the Chinese state and exposing brutal scam compounds in the country; examining Beijing’s influence on Chinese-language media in Singapore and its efforts to wield influence in Indonesia and elsewhere through vocational programs; scrutinizing China’s cross-national repression of Uyghur Muslims, especially in Central and Southeast Asia; and investigating how its promise of prosperity brought Laos debt and distress.

Mahtani joined the Washington Post in 2018 as the Southeast Asia and Hong Kong Bureau Chief. She reported extensively from Myanmar, the Philippines, Laos, and other parts of the region. Most notably, she chronicled China’s subjugation of Hong Kong, from the explosive protests in 2019, triggered by Beijing’s proposal to extradite locals to the mainland, through the systematic crushing of the Hong Kong pro-democracy movement, to the dismantling of the city’s autonomy and the many ways it is changing.

Shibani Mahtani’s journalism is defined by a courageous and relentless pursuit of speaking truth to power. Her work exemplifies the vital role of investigative reporting.
Kiyoteru Tsutsui
Director, Shorenstein APARC

Sign up for APARC newsletters to receive our experts' analysis and commentary >



Her searing coverage of Hong Kong’s struggle includes a multimedia investigative report into Hong Kong police misconduct during the 2019 pro-democracy demonstrations, for which she earned a Human Rights Press Award, and an exclusive on the alleged torture of a key prosecution witness in Hong Kong’s highest-profile trial of pro-democracy media tycoon Jimmy Lai. Mahtani continued to pursue that story, most recently reporting on Lai’s 20-year prison sentence, even after losing her job when the Washington Post sharply reduced its International team as part of mass layoffs.

Mahtani is also the co-author of the 2023 book, Among the Braves: Hope, Struggle, and Exile in the Battle for Hong Kong and the Future of Global Democracy, a narrative history of Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement that explores it through the eyes of people on the ground, culminating in the 2019 mass protests and Beijing’s crackdown. 

Before joining the Washington Post, she was a correspondent for the Wall Street Journal and reported from Singapore, Myanmar, and Chicago.

“Shibani Mahtani’s journalism is defined by a courageous and relentless pursuit of speaking truth to power,” said APARC Director Kiyoteru Tsutsui. “Her work exemplifies the vital role of investigative reporting: to expose complex systems of repression and give voice to those who have been silenced. We are proud to honor her outstanding journalism with the Shorenstein Award.”

Sponsored and presented annually by APARC, the Shorenstein Award recognizes journalists and news media outlets that leverage a deep knowledge of Asian societies to share crucial insights with a global audience. The award carries a $10,000 cash prize and honors the legacy of APARC’s benefactor, Mr. Walter H. Shorenstein, and his twin passions for promoting excellence in journalism and understanding of Asia. It also demonstrates APARC’s commitment to journalism that persistently and courageously seeks accuracy, deep reporting, and nuanced coverage in an age when attacks are regularly launched against independent news media, fact-based truth, and those who tell it.

The selection committee for the award praised Mahtani’s investigations as groundbreaking and revelatory, noting that, in her coverage of Hong Kong, she has broken stories others would not – or could not – report.

The committee members are William Dobson, co-editor of the Journal of Democracy; Anna Fifield, a journalist and foreign affairs analyst, non-resident fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and recipient of the 2018 Shorenstein Journalism Award; James Hamilton, vice provost for undergraduate education, the Hearst Professor of Communication, and director of the Stanford Journalism Program, Stanford University; Louisa Lim, associate professor, Audio-Visual Journalism Culture and Communication at the University of Melbourne; and Raju Narisetti, partner and global leader at McKinsey Global Publishing, McKinsey & Company.

Twenty-four winners previously received the Shorenstein Award. Recent honorees include Chris Buckley, the chief China correspondent for the New York Times; Emily Feng, international correspondent for NPR covering China, Taiwan, and more; Netra News, Bangladesh's premier independent media outlet; The Caravan, India's premier magazine of long-form journalism; and Nobel Laureate Maria Ressa, co-founder and CEO of the Philippines-based news organization Rappler.

Information about the 2026 Shorenstein Journalism Award ceremony celebrating Mahtahni will be forthcoming in the autumn quarter.

Read More

Tasneem Khalil delivers remarks at a lectern.
News

Shorenstein Journalism Award Honors Netra News, Spotlights Public Interest Reporting Advancing Democracy and Accountability in Bangladesh

The 2025 Shorenstein Journalism Award recognized Netra News, Bangladesh’s premier independent media outlet, at a celebration featuring Tasneem Khalil, its founding editor-in-chief, who discussed its mission and joined a panel of experts in considering the prospects for democracy in Bangladesh.
Shorenstein Journalism Award Honors Netra News, Spotlights Public Interest Reporting Advancing Democracy and Accountability in Bangladesh
Kimberly Hoang and Kiyoteru Tsutsui seated in an office during a recorded podcast conversation.
News

Weaponized Corruption, Extreme Wealth, and Democratic Reordering: Insights from Asia

Speaking on the APARC Briefing video series, University of Chicago sociologist Kimberly Kay Hoang examines the architecture of global capital and how corruption discourse is transforming governance and political order in Asia and the United States.
Weaponized Corruption, Extreme Wealth, and Democratic Reordering: Insights from Asia
Panelists gather for a group photo at the 2026 Oksenberg Conference.
News

Indo-Pacific Powers Diversify and De-Risk as Multipolar World Takes Shape

At the 2026 Oksenberg Conference, scholars and foreign policy experts assessed how Indo-Pacific powers are coping with a less predictable United States as China pursues selective leadership and Russia exploits Western divisions.
Indo-Pacific Powers Diversify and De-Risk as Multipolar World Takes Shape
Hero Image
Portrait photo of Shibani Mahtan, winner of the 2026 Shorenstein Journalism Award.
All News button
1
Subtitle

Sponsored by Stanford University’s Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, the 25th annual Shorenstein Journalism Award honors Mahtani for her exemplary investigations into the erosion of democracy in Hong Kong and China's growing global influence.

Date Label
Display Hero Image Wide (1320px)
Yes
-
5.15.26 DAL Event

The Democracy Action Lab (DAL) at the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) and the Stanford Society for Latin American Politics (SSLAP) will host a discussion on the evolving crisis of democracy in Peru, centered on the concept of “democratic hollowing,” a form of democratic erosion driven not by the concentration of power, but by its fragmentation and weakening.

Since 2016, Peru has had eight presidents. This is perhaps the clearest indicator of the depth and nature of its political crisis. Over the past decade, Peru has experienced severe democratic instability, marked by political hyperfragmentation, institutional conflict, and social unrest. Rather than following the classic pattern of democratic backsliding driven by the concentration of power, Peru illustrates a different pathway: democratic erosion through the dilution of power. This process, described as democratic hollowing, involves weak parties, fragmented political actors, and the erosion of representation, leading to governance paralysis, short-term political incentives, and an increasing reliance on coercion as a substitute for effective democratic authority. In this conversation with Alberto Vergara, we will explore Peru’s current political landscape, examine the characteristics of this pathway of erosion — described as democratic hollowing — and discuss the institutional interventions that could help steer the country toward democratic renewal.

The event will feature a conversation with Alberto Vergara and will bring together academic and policy perspectives to examine how democracies can decay even in the absence of a dominant authoritarian leader.

SPEAKER

Alberto Vergara - Professor at the Department of Social and Political Sciences at the Universidad del Pacífico (Lima, Peru)

MODERATOR

Alberto Díaz-Cayeros — Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Professor, by courtesy, of Political Science, and Co-Director of DAL

Alberto Díaz-Cayeros
Alberto Díaz-Cayeros

In-person event for Stanford affiliates only: Philippines Conference Room (Encina Hall, 3rd floor)

Livestream available to the public: via Zoom, if prompted for a password, use: 123456

Alberto Vergara Speaker
Panel Discussions
Image
5.15.26 DAL Event
Date Label
-
DAL Event 4.17.26

The Democracy Action Lab (DAL) and the Poverty, Violence, and Governance Lab (PovGov) at the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) at Stanford University invite you to a screening and discussion of El Salvador: A Carceral State of Terror, a short video grounded in field research led by Dr. Beatriz Magaloni. The event will bring together scholars and practitioners to examine the consequences of El Salvador’s state of exception, its implications for democratic institutions and civil liberties, and the broader regional resonance of the so-called “Bukele model.”

The session will combine visual storytelling with expert analysis, fostering a conversation that bridges rigorous research with practitioner insights.

BACKGROUND

Nayib Bukele, President of El Salvador, is currently one of the most popular leaders in Latin America. Much of this support stems from the perception that his administration has successfully addressed the country’s most pressing issue: gang-related violence. To achieve this, Bukele implemented a state of exception, repeatedly extended, which allows military and police forces to detain individuals — primarily young men from low-income backgrounds — without judicial warrants. This security strategy has gained international attention and has become a reference point for political actors across the region. However, this apparent success carries significant costs.

Dr. Beatriz Magaloni, together with a research team from the Democracy Action Lab at Stanford University, conducted an in-depth field investigation into the consequences of the state of exception in El Salvador. The study includes fieldwork in both urban and rural areas, over one hundred hours of interviews, and qualitative analysis of testimonies and institutional dynamics.

KEY FINDINGS

The findings align with warnings from national and international human rights organizations, as well as leading media outlets. They point to severe human rights violations, including mass detention of innocent individuals without due process, the systematic use of torture in detention centers, and cases of enforced disappearance. Dr. Magaloni characterizes this system as a “carceral state of terror.” Additionally, the research highlights that the system has created economic incentives that disproportionately affect impoverished families, has become a tool to silence dissent and political opposition, and is contributing to significant democratic backsliding in the country.

SPEAKERS

  • Mr. Noah Bullock —  Executive Director, Cristosal,  a regional human rights organization working across El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras

  • Dr. Beatriz Magaloni — Graham H. Stuart Professor of International Relations, Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Director of PovGov, and Co-Director of DAL

  • Mr. Manuel Ortiz — Journalist, sociologist, and Audio Visual Consultant at the Democracy Action Lab
     

MODERATOR

  • Dr. Alberto Díaz-Cayeros — Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Professor, by courtesy, of Political Science, and Co-Director of DAL
Alberto Díaz-Cayeros
Alberto Díaz-Cayeros

In-person event for Stanford affiliates only: William J. Perry Conference Room (Encina Hall, 2nd floor)

Livestream available to the public: via Zoom, if prompted for a password, use: 123456

Noah Bullock Panelist

Dept. of Political Science
Encina Hall, Room 436
Stanford University,
Stanford, CA

(650) 724-5949
0
Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies
Graham H. Stuart Professor of International Relations
Professor of Political Science
beatriz_magaloni_2024.jpg MA, PhD

Beatriz Magaloni Magaloni is the Graham Stuart Professor of International Relations at the Department of Political Science. Magaloni is also a Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute, where she holds affiliations with the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) and the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC). She is also a Stanford’s King Center for Global Development faculty affiliate. Magaloni has taught at Stanford University for over two decades.

She leads the Poverty, Violence, and Governance Lab (Povgov). Founded by Magaloni in 2010, Povgov is one of Stanford University’s leading impact-driven knowledge production laboratories in the social sciences. Under her leadership, Povgov has innovated and advanced a host of cutting-edge research agendas to reduce violence and poverty and promote peace, security, and human rights.

Magaloni’s work has contributed to the study of authoritarian politics, poverty alleviation, indigenous governance, and, more recently, violence, crime, security institutions, and human rights. Her first book, Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico (Cambridge University Press, 2006) is widely recognized as a seminal study in the field of comparative politics. It received the 2007 Leon Epstein Award for the Best Book published in the previous two years in the area of political parties and organizations, as well as the Best Book Award from the American Political Science Association’s Comparative Democratization Section. Her second book The Politics of Poverty Relief: Strategies of Vote Buying and Social Policies in Mexico (with Alberto Diaz-Cayeros and Federico Estevez) (Cambridge University Press, 2016) explores how politics shapes poverty alleviation.

Magaloni’s work was published in leading journals, including the American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, Criminology & Public Policy, World Development, Comparative Political Studies, Annual Review of Political Science, Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing, Latin American Research Review, and others.

Magaloni received wide international acclaim for identifying innovative solutions for salient societal problems through impact-driven research. In 2023, she was named winner of the world-renowned Stockholm Prize in Criminology, considered an equivalent of the Nobel Prize in the field of criminology. The award recognized her extensive research on crime, policing, and human rights in Mexico and Brazil. Magaloni’s research production in this area was also recognized by the American Political Science Association, which named her recipient of the 2021 Heinz I. Eulau Award for the best article published in the American Political Science Review, the leading journal in the discipline.

She received her Ph.D. in political science from Duke University and holds a law degree from the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México.

Director, Poverty, Violence, and Governance Lab
Co-director, Democracy Action Lab
CV
Date Label
Beatriz Magaloni Panelist
Manuel Ortiz Panelist
Film Screenings
Date Label
Paragraphs

In late November, 2025, five human rights organisations petitioned the Israeli High Court of Justice to allow for the evacuation of patients from the Gaza Strip into the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Gaza's health-care infrastructure faces near-total breakdown, with WHO reporting that only 18 of the 36 hospitals in Gaza are partially functioning.1 Essential services, including chemotherapy, intensive care, paediatric care, advanced imaging, and oncological surgery, are almost entirely inaccessible. The situation has been exacerbated by Israel's recent decision to block numerous leading international aid organisations from providing relief in the Gaza Strip on the grounds that they have refused to adhere to newly imposed requirements to list all employees by name to Israeli authorities, which has drawn significant criticism from the humanitarian sector and several of Israel's allies.2,3 According to a UN's press briefing as of mid-December, 2025, 18 500 patients, including 4096 children, are awaiting medical evacuation for treatment of conditions that cannot be treated in Gaza, including paediatric cancer and corrective surgeries.1 The petition is awaiting a High Court hearing and was not signed by the Israeli Medical Association, which argued that the issue is political. Allowing patients' access to medical treatment is a fundamental medical and humanitarian obligation, grounded in the right to health and in professional medical ethics.

Under international humanitarian law, an occupying power has a duty to act “to the fullest extent of the means available to it”, to “ensure the food and medical supplies of the population”, and to “ensur[e] and maintain…[medical] services, public health and hygiene in the occupied territory.”4,5 The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has determined that Israel bears the obligations of an occupying power that are “commensurate with the degree of its effective control” in Gaza.6 The health system in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is funded by the Palestinian Authority. It is designed and committed to care for Palestinian patients at scale, both in response to urgent medical emergencies and as an integrated system capable of providing continuity of care to those who return to Gaza.

Continue reading at thelancet.com.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Authors
Tom Dannenbaum
Ruth Gibson
Paragraphs

I. Executive Summary
This companion report provides an overview of U.S. General License 134A and the current state  of U.S., EU, and UK sanctions targeting Gazprom, Rosneft, their subsidiaries, trade unions, and corporate leadership. It is intended to serve as an expert analysis of the current sanctions  landscape against Gazprom and Rosneft, and to outline next steps in sanctions, considering the  alleged war crimes published by the Yale School of Public Health’s Humanitarian Research Lab (HRL) in their report, “Willing Accomplices: Gazprom and Rosneft’s Role in the Transport and  Indoctrination of Ukraine’s Children”, on March 25, 2026. Yale HRL has established with high  confidence that Gazprom and Rosneft, together with their subsidiaries and trade unions,  facilitated the transportation and re-education of at least 2,158 Ukrainian children between  February 2022 and March 2025.


On March 12, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control  (OFAC) issued General License 134. This license allows the sale, delivery, and offloading of  Russian-origin crude oil and petroleum products loaded onto shipping vessels on or before 12  March 2026. This authorization is valid until April 11, 2026. The measure, intended to stabilize  global energy markets in light of disruptions caused by US/Israeli attacks on Iran, applies to  previously sanctioned Russian oil and gas entities such as Rosneft and Gazprom. As a result,  Gazprom and Rosneft will receive revenue from transactions permitted under this temporary 30- day license that would otherwise have been prohibited. This sanctions relief financially benefits  two companies alleged to be implicated in war crimes, based on the open-source investigation by the Yale HRL. This general license should not be extended by OFAC after it expires on April 11, 2026.

Download the full report below.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Reports
Publication Date
Subtitle

Companion Report to “Willing Accomplices: Gazprom and Rosneft’s Role in the Transport and Indoctrination of Ukraine’s Children” The Yale Humanitarian Research Lab

Authors
Ruth Gibson
Paragraphs

The world’s largest humanitarian crisis is continuing to spiral in Sudan, where the war between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and its former ally, the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), is poised to enter its fourth year. The impact on civilians has been severe. In a briefing to the United Nations Security Council on January 19, Nazhat Shameem Khan, the deputy prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC), described a campaign of “widespread mass criminality” and characterized the situation as one of “collective torture.” The U.N. Independent International Fact-Finding Mission for the Sudan released a report on Feb. 17 documenting RSF war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.

Now, new evidence is available about a specific set of international crimes carried out by the RSF. This morning, March 10, the Yale Humanitarian Research Lab (Yale HRL) published a report that relies on remote sensing technology to establish a devastating pattern of RSF conduct in the vicinity of El-Fasher, Sudan between March 31 and June 12, 2024. The report draws on multiple data sources to expose the RSF’s systematic razing of agricultural communities, destruction of livestock corrals, and displacement or killing of inhabitants in the agrarian villages that are a critical local source of food for El-Fasher. During the 10 weeks under analysis, the RSF attacked, sometimes repeatedly, 41 rural farming communities on some of the most fertile land in Darfur. Together with the RSF’s denial of humanitarian access to El-Fasher (including through constructing an earthen wall to block entry and exit completed in October 2025) and targeting of markets and community kitchens within the city, attacks on agricultural communities and systems in the surrounding area formed a critical component of the group’s starvation strategy during the 18-month siege that culminated in the fall of El-Fasher on Oct. 26, 2025.

Continue reading at justsecurity.org

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Paragraphs

On Feb. 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched a war of aggression against Iran, in clear violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and customary international law, according to a consensus of international law experts with whom we agree. Iran responded with a series of unlawful attacks against States in the region.

In a piece published last week by Just Security, Professors Yuval Shany and Amichai Cohen suggested the U.S. and Israeli strikes against Iran, and the notably mild or even supportive response by certain western States, reflects a general dissatisfaction with international law on the prohibition on the use of force. They suggest that international law must change to accommodate such States’ frustrations if a viable international legal order is to survive. We disagree.

There is no doubt that there are systemic and structural problems with the international architecture to respond to States that transgress international law. Yet, the inference of a general dissatisfaction with the substantive rules of the U.N. Charter is unfounded. For the overwhelming majority of the 193 Member States in the United Nations, the prohibition on the use of force remains evidently in their interests. Many have made this clear, with varying degrees of directness, in their responses to the current war. 

Continue reading at justsecurity.org

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Subscribe to Human Rights