Facebook’s data is a sociological gold mine. Outside scholars need access.
Facebook’s data is a sociological gold mine. Outside scholars need access.
The social media company shouldn’t be able to hide information about whether and how it harms users (from the Washington Post)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c725/5c72518b83bafa39591be066db9ab8d5582face8" alt="Frances Haugen 60 minutes interview"
The disclosures made by whistleblower Frances Haugen about Facebook — first to the Wall Street Journal and then to “60 Minutes” — ought to be the stuff of shareholders’ nightmares: When she left Facebook, she took with her documents showing, for example, that Facebook knew Instagram was making girls’ body-image issues worse, that internal investigators knew a Mexican drug cartel was using the platform to recruit hit men and that the company misled its own oversight board about having a separate content appeals process for a large number of influential users. (Haugen is scheduled to appear before a Congressional panel on Tuesday.)
Facebook, however, may be too big for the revelations to hurt its market position — a sign that it may be long past time for the government to step in and regulate the social media company. But in order for policymakers to effectively regulate Facebook — as well as Google, Twitter, TikTok and other Internet companies — they need to understand what is actually happening on the platforms.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce113/ce113062c59aa780c188266b5a20b265aa00b26f" alt="Nate Persily"