The abrupt fall of an authoritarian regime often surprises the world with apparent suddenness. Given the right moment of opportunity, skillfully applied pressure can prove a thuggish regime surprisingly brittle. However, these moments are prepared through a long struggle for democratic rights within a closed society. Technology can help create these openings, organize activists, document abuses and share information in the moment that the eyes of the world are watching.
Being prepared to seize the day requires more than tech, though: activists and citizens are most effective in political groups, using good organizing approaches. International development organizations, funders, academics, tech companies and others can help, but must consider the entire terrain - political, human, social and technical - in their efforts because liberation technology can land people in jail - or worse. Savvy authoritarians have inherent advantages in this "cat-and-mouse" game.
This talk addresses the role of technology in fragile democracies and closed societies from NDI's perspective as implementers of democracy strengthening programs.
Chris Spence is Chief Technology Officer at the National Democratic Institute. In this capacity he manages NDI's work in employing the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to promote and strengthen democracy around the world through NDI programs, and has done so since 1996. Mr. Spence was the first staff person to specialize in ICTs for democratic development at NDI, and during his tenure with NDI has overseen ICT programs in dozens of countries around the world in all of NDI's program areas and positioned the Institute as a leader in the use of ICTs in democratic development. Areas of specialization include ICT and e-governance projects, including working with legislatures, local government, election monitoring, political parties and civil society organizations in developing countries and emerging democracies.
Mr. Spence brings to NDI a combination of information technology and international relations expertise. He started his technology career in 1986 in Silicon Valley with positions in several companies including Oracle Corporation, Netscape Communications and Triad Systems.
In a June 4, 2010 policy paper from the Brookings Institution's Center on the United States and Europe, Steven Pifer outlines common objectives to the new START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) but points out that no serious flaws appear to threaten the treaty's chances for ratification.
Steven Pifer is former ambassador to Ukraine. Steven Pifer’s career as a Foreign Service officer centered on Europe, the former Soviet Union and arms control. In addition to Kyiv, he had postings in London, Moscow, Geneva and Warsaw as well as on the National Security Council. He is currently at Visiting Fellow at the Brookings Institution, focusing on Ukraine and Russia issues. He is a frequent invited expert speaker at the Forum on Contemporary Europe.
New Draper Hills Summer Fellows come to Stanford to study linkages between democracy, development, and the rule of law
Rising leaders from a diverse group of nations in transition, including China, Russia, Ukraine, Syria, Iran, Iraq,
Pakistan, Egypt, Kenya, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, and Nigeria arrived on campus on July 25 for a three-week seminar as Draper Hills Summer Fellows on Democracy and
Development. Initiated by FSI's Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule
of Law (CDDRL) six years ago, the program has created a network of some 139
leaders from 62 transitioning countries.
This year's exceptional class of
23 fellows includes a deputy minister of Ukraine, current and former members of parliament (including a deputy speaker), leading attorneys and rule
of law experts, civic activists, journalists, international
development practitioners, and founders of non-governmental organizations (NGOs). (One fellow needed to withdraw because he was named to the Cabinet of the new Philippine president, Noynoy Aquino).
Draper Hills Summer Fellows are innovative, courageous, and
committed leaders, who strive to improve governance, enhance civic
participation, and invigorate development under very challenging
circumstances" - Larry Diamond"Draper Hills Summer Fellows are innovative, courageous, and
committed leaders, who strive to improve governance, enhance civic
participation, and invigorate development under very challenging
circumstances," says CDDRL Director Larry Diamond. "This year's fellows are
an inspiring group. They have come here to learn from us, but even more so from one another. And we will learn much from them, about
the progress they are making and the obstacles they confront as they work to build democracy, improve government
accountability, strengthen the rule of law, energize civil society, and enhance
the institutional environment for broadly shared economic growth."
The three-week
seminar is taught by an interdisciplinary team of leading Stanford faculty. In
addition to Diamond, faculty include FSI Senior Fellow and CDDRL Deputy
Director Kathryn Stoner; Stanford President Emeritus Gerhard Casper; FSI
Deputy Director and political science Professor Stephen D. Krasner; Olivier
Nomellini Senior Fellow Francis Fukuyama; professor of political science,
philosophy, and law Joshua Cohen; professor of pediatrics and Stanford Health
Policy core faculty Paul H. Wise; visiting associate professor Beth van Schaack;
FSI Senior Fellow Helen Stacy; Walter P. Falcon, deputy director, Program on Food
Security and the Environment; Erik Jensen, co-director of the Stanford Law School's Rule of Law Program; Avner Greif,
professor of economics; Rick Aubry, lecturer in management, Stanford Graduate School of Business; and Nicholas Hope, director,
Stanford Center on International Development.
Other leading experts who will engage the fellows include
President of the National Endowment for Democracy Carl Gershman, United States
Court of Appeals Judge Pamela Rymer, International Center on Nonviolent
Conflict founding chair Peter Ackerman, Omidyar Network partner Matt Halprin,
Conservation International's Olivier Langrand, executives of leading Silicon
Valley companies, such as Google and Facebook, and media and nonprofit organizations in the
Bay Area. Michael McFaul, a
Stanford political science professor and former CDDRL director, who now serves
on the National Security Council as President Obama's chief advisor on Russia,
will come to campus to teach a session on U.S. foreign policy in the Obama
administration.
The demanding, but compelling curriculum will devote the first
week of the seminar to defining the fundamentals of democracy, good governance, economic development, and the rule of
law. In the second week, faculty
will turn to democratic and economic transitionsand the feedback mechanisms between democracy,
development, and a predictable rule of law. This week will include offerings
on liberation technology, social entrepreneurship, and issues raised by
development and the environment.
The third week will turn to the critical - and often controversial -
role of international assistance to foster and support democracy, judicial
reform, and economic development, including the proper role of foreign aid.
Our program helps to create a broader community of
global activists and practitioners, intent on sharing experiences to bring
positive change to some of the world's most troubled countries and regions" - Kathryn Stoner-Weiss The fellows themselves also lead discussions, focused on the
concrete challenges they face in their ongoing work in political and economic
development. "Fellows come to realize that they are often engaged in solving
similar problems - such as endemic corruption in different country contexts,"
says Kathryn Stoner-Weiss. "Our program helps to create a broader community of
global activists and practitioners, intent on sharing experiences to bring
positive change to some of the world's most troubled countries and regions."
The program has received generous gifts from donors William
Draper III and Ingrid Hills. Bill
Draper made his gift in honor of his father, Maj. Gen. William H. Draper, Jr.,
a chief advisor to Gen. George Marshall and chief diplomatic administrator of
the Marshall Plan in Germany, who confronted challenges comparable to those
faced by Draper Hills Summer Fellows in building democracy, a market economy,
and a rule of law, often in post-conflict conditions. Ingrid von Mangoldt
Hills, made her gift in honor of her husband, Reuben Hills, president and
chairman of Hills Bros. Coffee and a leading philanthropist. The Hills project
they ran for 12 years improved the lives of inner city children and Ingrid saw
in the Summer Fellows Program a promising opportunity to improve the lives of
so many people in developing countries.
Thanking the program's benefactors, Larry Diamond says, "The benefit to
CDDRL faculty and researchers is incalculable, and we are deeply grateful for the vision and generosity of Bill Draper and Ingrid Hills." As he and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss
state, "The Draper Hills Summer Fellows Program allows us to interact with a highly,
talented group of emerging leaders in political and economic development from diverse countries and regions. They
benefit from exposure to the faculty's cutting edge work, while we benefit from
a cycle of feedback on whether these ideas work in the field." Like CDDRL, which bridges academic
theory and policy, the Draper Hills Summer Fellows Program, they note, "is an
ideal marriage between democratic and development theory and practice."
We
are pleased to be able to announce that the Program on Liberation Technology
will have two new visiting scholars from September 2010 - Patrick Meier and
Evgeny Morozov.
Patrick Meier is a fourth-year PhD Candidate at The Fletcher School of
Law & Diplomacy and Co-Director of the Program on
Crisis Mapping and Early Warning at the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative. His dissertation research
analyzes the impact of the information revolution on the balance of power
between repressive rule and civil resistance. He is particularly interested in how repressive regimes and
resistance groups use information communication technologies to further their
own strategic and tactical goals. Patrick serves as Director of Crisis Mapping
and Strategic Partnerships at Ushahidi and co-founded the International Network of Crisis Mappers. He is also on the Board
of Advisors of DigiActive and Digital Democracy, two leading digital activism and democracy initiatives. Patrick
blogs at iRevolution and Early Warning.
Evgeny Morozov is a leading thinker and
commentator on the political impact of the Internet and a well known opponent
of internet utopianism. He is
a contributing
editor to Foreign Policy and runs the magazine's Net Effect blog about the Internet's
impact on global politics. Evgeny is currently a Yahoo! fellow at the Institute for
the Study of Diplomacy at Georgetown University. Prior to his appointment to Georgetown,
he was a fellow at the Open
Society Institute, where he remains on the
board of the Information Program. Before moving to the US, Evgeny was based in
Berlin and Prague, where he was Director of New Media at Transitions Online, a
media development NGO active in 29 countries of the former Soviet bloc. He is
writing a book about the Internet and democracy, to be published this fall by
PublicAffairs.
The Nuclear Risk Reduction initiative engages technical and policy experts to reduce nuclear risks by promoting collaboration between the United States and Russia, China and Pakistan. To achieve this, NRR conducts academic research on issues such as the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and hosts events to encourage expanding scientific collaboration around nuclear materials security and accountability, diversion scenarios of nuclear materials and emergency response to nuclear terrorism.
By the end of the year, scholars of security studies will be able to use a new website to learn how terrorist and militant organizations evolve over time and how they collaborate with--and compete against--one another.
"Mapping Terrorist Organizations," an interdisciplinary online project headed by CISAC Senior Fellow Martha Crenshaw, will focus initially on providing detailed, annotated information on militant and terrorist groups operating in Iraq since 2003, Pakistan and Afghanistan--areas of current policy concern for the United States. Future plans involve expanding research to include groups in Latin America, Europe, the Middle East and the United States and, if time and resources permit, to include major historical groups such as the Russian revolutionary movement.
The three-year project is funded by a $500,000 grant awarded to Crenshaw last fall by the National Science Foundation. It is part of the Department of Defense's Minerva Initiative launched in 2008 to support "research related to basic social and behavioral science of strategic importance to U.S. national security policy."
"No such study exists in the literature of terrorism," Crenshaw wrote in a report on the project. "Evolutionary mapping can enhance our understanding of how terrorist groups develop and interact with each other and with the government, how strategies of violence and non-violence are related, why groups appear and disappear, and how opportunities and constraints in the environment change organizational behavior over time." Furthermore, Crenshaw noted that visual mapping of highly complex, shifting information is likely to stimulate new observations that might otherwise have been overlooked."
Student involvement
Daniel Cassman, a 2010 CISAC honors graduate in political science and computer science, is building the site, which will contain interactive timelines, family trees and detailed group profiles. Cassman's programming--developed specifically for the website--will allow scholars to better understand and analyze patterns and structures of violent and non-violent opposition groups in multiple contexts.
At a June 1 meeting of a half dozen students working on the project, Crenshaw said one of the most challenging problems facing researchers is documenting how terrorist organizations evolve over time. With no official sources to rely on, Crenshaw's team spent the last year combing through government documents and academic research, autobiographies, newspaper reports and even jihadist websites-many of which disappear as quickly as they pop up. Crenshaw acknowledges that "precision in this field is elusive" even though the project emphasizes using documented primary sources. Students working on the project include Christy Abizaid and Sadika Hameed, 2010 graduates of the International Policy Studies master's program, and undergraduates Rob Conroy, Asfandyar Mir and Ari Weiss. CISAC staff member Julia McKinnon is assisting Crenshaw as well.
"We're keenly interested in changes in the sizes of groups," Crenshaw said. "That's one of the hardest things to figure out." It also is difficult to know when a group dissolves, becomes dormant or morphs into something else, she said. To obtain as complete a profile as possible, the website will include information about failed and foiled plots, as well as successful attacks, she said.
Charles Nicas, a student in International Policy Studies and Public Policy, said he joined Crenshaw's project to learn more about militancy and terrorism in South Asia. "The U.S. presence in Afghanistan and the fact that Pakistan is a nuclear-armed country mean that the U.S. will be involved in this region...for a long time," he wrote in an email. "The complexity of the situation takes a lot of research to understand."
Nicas's area of work focuses on sectarian groups in Pakistan, mainly Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP) and its offshoot Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ), both virulently anti-Shia groups. Nicas said SSP was founded in 1985 with state support and spawned LeJ in the mid-1990s. The groups are based in Punjab province in eastern Pakistan but had a significant presence in neighboring Afghanistan during Taliban rule. Both have become increasingly allied with militant groups in the border region, including al-Qa'ida, and are part of an umbrella group known as the Punjabi Taliban. "I've been surprised to learn how far back the roots of this problem go, which makes the challenge of effectively countering it especially daunting," Nicas said.
Terrorist organizations profiled
In addition to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Crenshaw's website will feature profiles of the following groups:
1920s Revolution Brigades
Mujahideen Army
Islamic Army in Iraq
Ansar al-Islam
Al-Qa'ida in Iraq
Group profiles include the following attributes:
The group's name, including pseudonyms and name changes
A history with a timeline, including whether the group is active, dormant or disbanded
The group's goals/ideology
Key leaders
Group size (by date)
Resources in the form of money and weapons
Outside intervention and influence
Dates of first and last known attacks
Targets
Area of Operations
Tactics
Political activities (by date)
Key operational experiences (by date)
Known splinter groups (by date)
Relationship to other groups (by date)
Relationship with surrounding population/popular support
William J. Perry, former secretary of defense, and Siegfried S. Hecker, former director of Los Alamos National Laboratory, have joined forces to launch the Nuclear Risk Reduction initiative to address the changing nuclear threat following the end of the Cold War and the rise of international terrorism. The project is based at the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC), which Hecker co-directs.
"I have worked with Sig for many years, both inside and outside government," Perry said. "I am particularly pleased to have such an able collaborator on this effort, which I have said is the work to which I will dedicate the rest of my career."
Hecker said he is excited to work with Perry to reduce the global nuclear threat. "Our primary objectives will be to work toward a world with fewer weapons, to have fewer fingers on the nuclear trigger and to keep nuclear weapons and materials out of the wrong hands," he said. "Time is of the essence both because of the urgency of the threat and because of the renewed hope that major powers are willing to take serious steps to realize these goals."
Hecker and Perry, both giants in the field of nuclear defense and security, plan to bring their considerable experience and associations with the U.S. and international policy, military and scientific communities to achieve these objectives.
The Nuclear Risk Reduction initiative (NRR) builds on the work of the Preventive Defense Project (PDP) that was established at Stanford and Harvard 13 years ago under the leadership of Perry and Ashton B. Carter, a former assistant secretary of defense in the Clinton administration. The two men, during their time in government, tackled some of the most important security issues following the breakup of the Soviet Union through promoting the concept of preventive defense, which seeks to diminish the possibility of potential threats escalating into actual threats and conflict. Carter is serving currently in the Obama administration as undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics.
Hecker, as director of Los Alamos, was instrumental in creating the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship program to meet the challenges of the post-Cold War environment without nuclear testing. He also helped reduce the nuclear threat posed by Russia and other republics in the chaotic years that followed the breakup of the Soviet Union. At Stanford, he has expanded his activities to include work in Northeast Asia, South Asia and the Middle East.
NRR's three-prong approach for making the world a safer place:
1. Working toward a world free of nuclear weapons
Perry, along with former secretaries of state George Shultz and Henry Kissinger, and former Sen. Sam Nunn, launched a joint effort in 2007 to refocus world attention on the critical need to eliminate nuclear weapons, starting with practical measures to make the world a safer place. President Obama, who has embraced this vision, has begun to adopt policies that will move the United States in this direction. The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), signed April 8, 2010, by Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, reduces the number of strategic arsenals in each country to 1,550 warheads. Now Perry and Hecker, through NRR, are conducting a risk/benefit analysis of ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), another critical piece of legislation linked to nuclear weapon reductions. They will also explore with Russian colleagues deeper cuts in their respective nuclear arsenals along with engaging other nuclear weapons states on such critical issues.
2. Preventing proliferation of nuclear weapons
Perry and Hecker believe the risk of using nuclear weapons increases as more countries acquire them. Much of their focus is on the nuclear programs in North Korea and Iran, both of which threaten international peace and stability. In addition, as more states possess nuclear weapons and materials, it will become increasingly likely that fissile materials for an improvised nuclear device could fall into the hands of sub-national groups or terrorists.
Meanwhile, if there is to be a global renaissance of nuclear power, nations must learn how to manage potential proliferation risks associated with nuclear reactors and their fuel cycles. This is particularly critical if nuclear power spreads to developing countries that have expressed interest in this form of energy, since many have neither the requisite technological basis nor political stability to guarantee security.
3. Preventing nuclear terrorism
The 2010 Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, D.C. highlighted the importance of keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists. As President Obama stated, "It is increasingly clear that the danger of nuclear terrorism is one of the greatest threats to global security-to our collective security." Despite this, some nations view the terrorist threat with less alarm. NRR plans to engage the technical and military leadership in key countries to promote a common understanding of the dangers posed by such threats and what steps are needed to mitigate them.
President Obama also warned, "Nuclear materials that could be sold or stolen and fashioned into a nuclear weapon exist in dozens of nations." Harvard's Graham Allison stated if countries could, "Lock down all nuclear weapons and bomb-usable material as securely as gold in Fort Knox, they [could] reduce the likelihood of a nuclear 9/11 to nearly zero." During the Nuclear Summit, Obama announced a goal to "lock down" all nuclear materials by 2014. This is a laudable objective, but Perry and Hecker know it will require much more than physical security to protect nuclear sites worldwide. The two men will work toward a cooperative, global effort to help countries develop modern, comprehensive nuclear safeguard systems that can provide proper control and accounting, along with physical protection.
Hecker has experience regarding such work. In 1994, he initiated a nuclear materials protection, control and accounting program (the lab-to-lab program) with Russia's nuclear complex. Perry and Hecker, through NRR, plan to reinvigorate and broaden the scientific cooperation that existed between the United States and Russia in the 1990s. Moreover, they plan to collaborate with the technical, military and policy communities in key countries to realize NRR's ambitious agenda of making the world a safer and more secure place.
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and former FSI Advisory Board member Susan Rice '86 urged Stanford's graduating class to fight global poverty, conflict, and repression, saying "These massive disparities erode our common security and corrode our common humanity." Conflict-ridden states not only cause suffering for their people, she noted. "Poor and fragile states can incubate threats that spread far beyond borders -- terrorism, pandemic disease, nuclear proliferation, criminal networks" and more. "In our interconnected world," she said, " a threat to development anywhere is a threat to security everywhere."
When Susan Rice graduated from Stanford in 1986, the Soviet Union was
a formidable foe, China barely registered on the global economic scene
and the first computer laptops – weighing in at 12 pounds each – were
just hitting the market.
And if someone had told her that she'd serve in the Cabinet of the
country's first black president as ambassador to the United Nations, "I
would've asked them what they were smoking."
But in her remarks delivered during Stanford University's 119th
Commencement on Sunday, Rice put the advances of the past 24 years in
perspective. She called the fight against global poverty "not only one
of the great moral challenges of all time, but also one of the great
national security challenges of our time."
"The planet is still divided by fundamental inequalities," she said.
"Some of us live in peace, freedom and comfort while billions are
condemned to conflict, poverty and repression. These massive disparities
erode our common security and corrode our common humanity."
While she did not discuss any specifics of her role as the country's
ambassador to the United Nations or the organization's recent move to
impose a fourth round of sanctions on Iran, Rice did talk about the link
between poverty and security.
"When a country is wracked by war or weakened by want, its people
suffer first. But poor and fragile states can incubate
threats that spread far beyond borders – terrorism, pandemic disease,
nuclear proliferation, criminal networks, climate change, genocide and
more. In our interconnected age, a threat to development anywhere is a
threat to security everywhere." -Ambassador Susan Rice
Rice's address marked a very public return to Stanford. She graduated
with a bachelor's in history from the university as a junior Phi Beta
Kappa and Truman Scholar in 1986.
She was confirmed as ambassador to the United Nations in 2009 after
being nominated by President Obama. It was a job that followed her role
as Obama's senior adviser for national security affairs during his
presidential campaign in 2007 and 2008. Before that, she served as the
country's assistant secretary of state for African affairs and as a
special assistant to President Clinton. She was also a senior director
for African affairs at the National Security Council.
During a trip to a displaced persons camp in war-torn Angola in 1995,
Rice saw firsthand the global poverty she talked about on Sunday. Of
all the people she saw in the camp, she said one of her most striking
memories is the smile she received from a malnourished little boy when
she gave him her baseball cap.
But she's haunted by thoughts of what may have happened to him.
"I had to leave that camp," she said. "And when I did, I left that
little boy in hell. I like to think, and I sure hope, that kid is OK.
But he could well have become one of the 9 million children under the
age of 5 who die each year from preventable and treatable afflictions."
And that boy, she said, should be a symbol to Stanford's graduates of
the challenges that face them and the good they can do in the world.
"That little boy's future is tied to ours," she said. "Our security
is ultimately linked to his well-being. So we must shape the world he
deserves."
Rice's weighty remarks still left room for graduation levity. And the
student procession – known as the Wacky Walk – showcased much of it.
The graduates hit the field of Stanford Stadium with balloons and
signs thanking mom and dad. They were dressed as Egyptian kings and
Vikings, wizards and butterflies. Some wore bathing suits and flowing
togas. Others covered up with costumes paying homage to the pop culture
past of Pac-Man, as well as more timeless pursuits like dominoes and
poker.
It was a final blast of carefree fun for college students about to
contend with an uncertain job market.
"We have everything we need on campus," said Tyler Porras, a
graduating biology major who took to the field with a bolo tie and black
cowboy hat. "Now it's off to the real world where you need to find a
job."
The ceremony marked the award of 1,722 bachelor's degrees, 2,100
master's degrees and 980 doctoral degrees.
Departmental honors were awarded to 365 seniors, and 272 graduated
with university distinction. Another 74 graduated with multiple majors
and 33 received dual bachelor's degrees. There were 110 graduates
receiving both bachelor's and master's degrees.
Among international students, there were 102 undergraduates from 45
countries other than the United States, and 955 graduate students from
75 foreign countries.
"As you leave Stanford, I hope you carry a deep appreciation of the
values and traditions that are everlasting, as well as a willingness to
be bold and to approach challenges with a fresh perspective," Stanford
President John Hennessy told the graduates.
The day also gave parents a time to beam and brag.
"These kids have the potential to contribute so much to the world,"
said Tim Roake, whose daughter, Caitlin Roake, is graduating as a
biology major and is planning to join the Peace Corps.
Roake and his wife, Kathleen Gutierrez, had front-row seats in the
stadium bleachers next to Dave and Lori Gaskin. Their son, Greg, has
been dating Caitlin Roake since their freshman year.
"The last four years for Greg have been such an enriching experience
from an academic perspective but also on a personal level," Lori Gaskin
said. "I attribute that not only to the university but the wonderful
people he's met and the relationships he's made."
Hero Image
At Stanford's 119th commencement, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice urges the class of 2010 to fight poverty and global inequalities.
In the two months since the New START Treaty (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) was signed by Presidents Obama and Medvedev, critics have raised a number of questions about its terms and impact. So far, however, they have raised no substantive objection that could sink the treaty’s ratification prospects.
New START will reduce U.S. and Russian strategic warheads to a level of 1550—a cut of about 30 percent from what the sides were previously allowed. The treaty also sets limits on intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and nuclear-capable bombers. These limits will bring U.S. and Russian strategic nuclear forces to their lowest levels in 40 years.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee opened Senate review of the treaty on May 18. In the weeks since the treaty text was released in April, we have already seen the principal questions of treaty critics. What are the objections? What are the responses?
As tensions on the Korean peninsula rise after an international investigation found that North Korea was responsible for the sinking of a South Korean warship, a Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Independent Task Force warns that North Korea's continued provocations pose a serious threat to its neighbors and that its nuclear weapons program must be stopped. "The United States must seek to resolve rather than simply manage the challenge posed by a nuclear North Korea," asserts the Task Force.
In its report, U.S. Policy Toward the Korean Peninsula, the Task Force emphasizes that "despite the difficulty of the challenge, the danger posed by North Korea is sufficiently severe, and the costs of inaction and acquiescence so high, that the United States and its partners must continue to press for denuclearization." The United States cannot risk "the potential spread of nuclear weapons to rogue states, terrorist groups or others-especially in the Middle East."
The Task Force says that the United States also must provide leadership with its regional partners to "coordinate actions designed to contain the spillover effects of possible North Korean instability while insisting that North Korea give up its destabilizing course of action." It recommends that contingency pla nning be prioritized: "Given the uncertainties and associated risks related to North Korea's future, it is necessary and sensible for its neighbors to consider the possibility of volatility in North Korea and plan for its possible effects."
The bipartisan Task Force, chaired by former special envoy for negotiations with North Korea Charles L. "Jack" Pritchard and former commander of UN Command/U.S. Forces Korea John H. Tilelli Jr., and directed by CFR Adjunct Senior Fellow Scott A. Snyder, is comprised of roughly two dozen distinguished experts, including CISAC Co-Director Siegfried Hecker, representing a wide variety of backgrounds. The report commends the U.S.-South Korean partnership and applauds the close alliance coordination following the ship incident. The Task Force urges the passage of the South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, which it says is good for America and would send a strong message of support for South Korea.
While each member of the Six Party talks-China, Japan, North Korea, Russia, South Korea, and the United States-has its own concerns, "any hope of resolving the North Korean standoff will depend on all parties cooperating with one another and being firm with North Korea." The report emphasizes that "Chinese cooperation is essential to the success of denuclearization on the Korean peninsula and to ensuring regional stability."
The report makes several specific recommendations, including calling for the establishment of a dialogue with China about the future of the Korean peninsula, bilateral talks with North Korea regarding missile development, and close consultations with allies South Korea and Japan. The report recommends that the Obama administration prioritize its approach to North Korea in the following order.
Prevent horizontal proliferation: "The United States and its allies should heighten vigilance against the possibility of a transfer of nuclear weapons technologies or fissile material from North Korea and strengthen the capacity to carry out effective counterproliferation measures."
Stop vertical proliferation: "North Korea's unconstrained efforts to develop a missile delivery capability for its nuclear arsenal would dramatically expand its ability to threaten its neighbors and further complicate prospects for reversing its nuclear program."
Denuclearize: "The debate over nonproliferation versus denuclearization is a false choice; the United States and its partners can and must do both by containing proliferation while also pressing for denuclearization."
The Task Force recommends that the United States seek ways to integrate North Korea into the international community, including through cultural and academic exchanges. "The Obama administration should change long-standing U.S. policies blocking North Korea's participation in activities of international financial institutions," notes the report. It also condemns North Korea's abysmal human rights record: "North Korea's shameful human rights situation and failure to meet the needs of its people is a human tragedy that should be addressed by U.S. humanitarian assistance and other measures to improve human rights conditions inside North Korea."