When a Doctor’s Age Might Compromise Their Practice

When a Doctor’s Age Might Compromise Their Practice

A paper co-authored by Stanford Law School’s Michelle Mello examines policies that health-care organizations are implementing to address potential risks associated with cognitive and physical decline in late-career physicians (LCPs).
An older doctor talking to a patient Getty Images

As the U.S. physician workforce ages, health care organizations are under increasing pressure to address the potential risks associated with cognitive and physical decline in late-career physicians (LCPs), often defined as those 65 and older. In a new paper published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, co-author Michelle Mello, JD, PhD—a professor of law and of health policy—sheds light on the policies that some hospitals have implemented to screen aging physicians. The paper also offers recommendations to improve fairness, effectiveness, and physician acceptance of these programs.

Ensuring Safe Practice by Late Career Physicians: Institutional Policies and Implementation Experiences examines the approaches taken by 29 U.S. health care institutions, most of which mandate screening assessments once physicians reach a specific age, typically around 70. Although older physicians bring extensive clinical experience to patient care, they are at heightened risk for cognitive and sensory decline, as well as diminished knowledge currency and adherence to standards of care, according to the paper. Also, growing evidence indicates that, on average, patients treated by LCPs have worse clinical outcomes and are more likely to file complaints.

Read Stanford Report Story

Read More

Michelle Mello-Babcock Award
News

Mello Wins Law School Teaching Award for Mentorship and Integrity

Michelle Mello, a professor of law and of health policy, wins the annual teaching award at Stanford Law School, where her students call her an inspirational leader and committed mentor.
cover link Mello Wins Law School Teaching Award for Mentorship and Integrity
AI Diagnostic Tool-Illustration
Commentary

How AI Diagnostic Tools Can Lead to Financial Burdens for Patients

According to the co-authors of a perspective published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the use of AI diagnostic tools by medical practitioners can lead to unexpected financial burdens for their patients.
cover link How AI Diagnostic Tools Can Lead to Financial Burdens for Patients
Supreme Court building
Commentary

Ramifications of the Supreme Court’s Latest Term for Health Regulation

The Supreme Court ended its 2024 term with major rulings affecting federal agencies. SHP’s Michelle Mello writes in a JAMA viewpoint that while these rulings have critical ramifications for health agencies, the outlook is more complex than it might appear.
cover link Ramifications of the Supreme Court’s Latest Term for Health Regulation